Meeting Summary - 06/05/24 WMS Meeting

Grid Monitor Staff Writer
06/06/2024

<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">1 - Antitrust Admonition - Eric Blakey</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">2 - Agenda Review - Eric Blakey</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">3 - Approval of WMS Meeting Minutes - Vote - Eric Blakey</span></p> <p><a href="https://dash3.gridmonitor.com/sharing/?token=bb5c5d5f-3feb-47ec-9dd1-9c2bb4e2e614"><span style="font-weight: 400;">3.1</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - May 1, 2024</span></p> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">May 1, 2024 WMS Meeting Minutes added to combo ballot.</li> </ul> <p><a href="https://dash3.gridmonitor.com/sharing/?token=9b7b95e4-82ff-47b4-a06e-086553b87fe4"><span style="font-weight: 400;">4</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - Technical Advisory Committee - TAC - Update - Eric Blakey</span></p> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The major issues discussed were NOGRR245, where a $750 floor was agreed upon.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Comments from IMM file are expected this week, and triggers in NPRR1224 are scheduled to go to the board in a couple of weeks.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">NPRR1230, which involves a manual process for managing interconnection reliability operating limits for the summer, was tabled until the next TAC meeting on June 24.</span></li> </ul> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">5 - ERCOT Operations and Market Item</span></p> <p><a href="https://dash3.gridmonitor.com/sharing/?token=686a0556-3498-4d09-9db2-dbfd898f90fd"><span style="font-weight: 400;">5.1</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - NPRR1231, FFSS Program Communication Improvements and Additional Clarifications - Magie Shanks</span></p> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The proposed changes include the addition of a new distribution list&nbsp;</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">For communication regarding switching from primary to alternate resource and restocking fuel, contact FFSS@ERCOT.com</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Extension of the reporting time for deployments from 30 to 45 days after the FFSS season</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Language adjustments related to disqualification process and clarification of available resources during settlements</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Katie Rich from Luminant plans to file comments on the restocking issue</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Questions from stakeholders included inquiries about the current process of notifying a switch from primary to alternate and confirmation that both operators and settlements are tracking the new email communication</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">TAC has scheduled a special webex meeting for further discussion</span></li> </ul> <p><a href="https://dash3.gridmonitor.com/sharing/?token=3583c7f6-41eb-48ba-9cad-6507bd982459"><span style="font-weight: 400;">5.2</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - 2023 Annual UFE Report - Joe Lara</span></p> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">UFE (unaccounted for energy) is defined as the variance between generation and load losses, with sources including generation measurement errors, transmission, distribution, and load errors, and theft.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The 2023 Annual UFE Report included total UFE in megawatt hours and cost, percentage to ERCOT load, and factors contributing to UFE.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">2023 showed negative 1,078,199 total UFE, cost of $92 million, with a significant negative UFE during winter and mid-summer.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The report discussed the impact of non-metered accounts contributing to UFE, and the reasons for large negative UFE in January and February.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">It was mentioned that state estimator data for transmission losses would help improve UFE calculations and would begin in Q3 of 2024.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The presentation also covered historical yearly values, transmission loss factor calculations, forecasted transmission losses for 2024 and 2025, and NPR1145 for the use of state estimates for TLFs in settlement calculations.</span></li> </ul> <p><a href="https://dash3.gridmonitor.com/sharing/?token=2a5958c0-c58d-4bcf-82db-fa4e39d9d348"><span style="font-weight: 400;">6</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - Resource Cost Working Group - RCWG - Blake Holt</span></p> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Kiran Sidhu has switched employment from E360 power to RWE Renewables and is still interested in helping out in leadership.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">ERCOT gave an overview of the sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide emission price, stating that the prices for these products have not changed since 2020 ($2 a short ton for SO2, $3 a short ton for NOx).</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">ERCOT's suggestion is to remove the current subscription service and move forward with hard coded values for the emission prices, holding onto them until new EPA requirements come out, the market becomes more liquid, or TAC directs them to.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The Resource Cost Working Group (RCWG) expressed interest in reviewing and coming up with other suggestions, planning to meet again on June 25 to continue the discussion.</span></li> </ul> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">7 - WMS Revision Requests - Eric Blakey</span></p> <p><a href="https://dash3.gridmonitor.com/sharing/?token=6a6d1923-61bd-498a-bed3-d06e76d93570"><span style="font-weight: 400;">7.2</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - VCMRR039, Related to NPRR1216, Implementation of Emergency Pricing Program</span></p> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The language was approved last month.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Approval sought for the IA, which was no-cost.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">No concerns or comments raised, item added to combo ballot.</span></li> </ul> <p><a href="https://dash3.gridmonitor.com/sharing/?token=3916dff4-c267-4b4f-9457-90f23c5bd96e"><span style="font-weight: 400;">7.4</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - VCMRR040, Methodology for Calculating Fuel Adders for Coal-Fired Resources</span></p> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The methodology removes the necessity for ERCOT to purchase an annual coal price index</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Allows generators to submit their costs for coal and transportation to ERCOT for developing appropriate cost categories</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Item added to combo ballot</span></li> </ul> <p><a href="https://dash3.gridmonitor.com/sharing/?token=f91d9e54-0f74-4e0a-b8aa-7e2d50822c6d"><span style="font-weight: 400;">7.5</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - VCMRR041, SO2 and NOX Emission Prices Used in Verifiable Cost Calculations - RCWG</span></p> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">VCMRR041 is tabled to RCWG</span></li> </ul> <p><a href="https://dash3.gridmonitor.com/sharing/?token=7d84a302-b358-41c8-b497-721f1e573566"><span style="font-weight: 400;">8</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - Congestion Management Working Group - CMWG - Alex Miller</span></p> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Implementation plan for SCR819 to be released by the end of May</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Testing process for generators' response and honoring the flag during SCED intervals outlined</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Mitigation for ESRs discussed, just in time framework preferred methodology</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Draft NPRR for ESR mitigation to be discussed in July</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Other tabled items: CRR auction solution time, RDPA adder fix for locational price signals, and smaller load zones analysis</span></li> </ul> <p><a href="https://dash3.gridmonitor.com/sharing/?token=b20d80df-b60f-4de3-9eea-da5acfe14dba"><span style="font-weight: 400;">9 </span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">- Supply Analysis Working Group - SAWG - Greg Lackey</span></p> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Kevin Kaden (Astrape) presented a new BES ELCC methodology study</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Draft CONE study results presented by Sam Newell (Brattle)&nbsp;</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Greg Lackey presented a proposed methodology for investigating ELCCs for non-dispatchable technologies and proposed a plan or schedule for the study.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Matt Arthur from ERCOT provided an update on the status of the Excel workbook and final CONE study report filing.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">ERCOT's recommended changes to the ELCC studies were presented</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">VOLL survey results and response rates from different customer classes were discussed.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Next SAWG meeting on June 26.</span></li> </ul> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">10 - WMS Revision Requests Tabled at WMS - Possible Vote - Eric Blakey</span></p> <p><a href="https://dash3.gridmonitor.com/sharing/?token=ef38b9a8-2567-4cb5-a048-caa960dfed0b"><span style="font-weight: 400;">10.1</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - SMOGRR028, Add Series Reactor Compensation Factors - MWG</span></p> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">SMOGRR028 tabled at MWG</span></li> </ul> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">11 - New Protocol Revision Subcommittee - PRS - Referrals - Vote - Eric Blakey</span></p> <p><a href="https://dash3.gridmonitor.com/sharing/?token=cf20a8b2-5056-49ad-97c5-0fcb37638430"><span style="font-weight: 400;">11.1</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - NPRR1226, Demand Response Monitor</span></p> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Proposal for ERCOT to produce aggregate load response graphs with associated LMPs</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Proposal aims to estimate demand response from transmission customers</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">ERCOT to do analysis, select specific loads, and aggregate numbers without disclosing individual load data</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Proposal referred to DSWG for further discussion and resolution of concerns.</span></li> </ul> <p><a href="https://dash3.gridmonitor.com/sharing/?token=75f31716-9976-46af-b786-ad8a63c480cc"><span style="font-weight: 400;">12</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - Revision Requests Tabled at PRS and Referred to WMS - Possible Vote - Eric Blakey</span></p> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">No action taken on NPRRs listed on agenda</span></li> </ul> <p><a href="https://dash3.gridmonitor.com/sharing/?token=37e13e17-93db-4174-88da-34c4e04d12ce"><span style="font-weight: 400;">13</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - Combo Ballot - Vote - Eric Blakey</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><img src="/storage/docs/2024/06/WMSMotionsJune5Ballot.png" width="1125" height="129" /></span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><img src="/storage/docs/2024/06/June5WMSballot.png" width="1080" height="1080" /></span></p> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Motion carried unanimously</span></li> </ul> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">14 - Other Business - Eric Blakey</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">14.1 - Review Open Action Items - Jim Lee</span></p> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">No open action items were discussed</span></li> </ul> <p><a href="https://dash3.gridmonitor.com/sharing/?token=226c541b-c122-4b8a-9b11-5469bcc094a2"><span style="font-weight: 400;">14.2</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - 2025 Block Calendar</span></p> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Proposal to move a meeting slot from October 6 to October 8</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Announcement of 2025 ancillary service methodology and changes in timeline for review and approval</span></li> </ul> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">15 - Adjourn - Eric Blakey</span></p>