Frame

Meeting Summary - 01/22/2025 TAC Meeting

Grid Monitor AI
01/23/2025

<div class="news-image-container"><img src="/storage/docs/2025/01/01-23-2025-TAC-Hero.png" /></div> <h3><a href="/sharing/?token=28999a38-abef-4d50-9291-60a2e99f7b23">▶️</a> 1 - Antitrust Admonition Suzy Clifton</h3> <h3><a href="/sharing/?token=021f6836-52ab-40d3-94f1-c62fc8dc607c">▶️</a> 2 - Membership Introductions Suzy Clifton</h3> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Introduction of three new representatives:</li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Kyle Minnix from Brazos Electric Cooperative in the cooperative segment.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Seth Cochran from Vitol in the IPM segment.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Martha Henson from Oncor in the IOU segment.</li> </ul> </ul> <h3><a href="/sharing/?token=cfb644da-f400-4736-a8af-34bef41ad843">▶️</a> 3 - Election of 2025 TAC Chair and Vice Chair -Vote- Suzy Clifton</h3> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Mark Dreyfus nominated Caitlin Smith for TAC Chair, who accepted the nomination.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">No other nominations were received for TAC Chair, hence Caitlin Smith was elected by acclamation.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Richard Ross nominated Martha Henson for TAC Vice Chair, who accepted the nomination.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">No other nominations were received for TAC Vice Chair, hence Martha Henson was elected by acclamation.</li> </ul> <h3><a href="/sharing/?token=4ade54e8-f0f9-4f92-ac55-bf20e8c244ec">▶️</a> 4 - Approval of TAC Meeting Minutes -Vote- TAC Chair</h3> <h4><a href="/sharing/?token=4439adb1-e66f-445d-964f-ece48fdaf921">▶️</a> 4.1 - November 20, 2024</h4> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion to approve the November 20, 2024 meeting minutes as presented added to the combo ballot.</li> </ul> <h3><a href="/sharing/?token=dc044c12-4a61-487a-a429-5dca170e520a">▶️</a> 5 - Meeting Updates TAC Chair</h3> <h4><a href="/sharing/?token=047f4c09-7fab-4567-87f2-50abcc207f59">▶️</a> 5.1 - November/December Board/PUCT Meetings</h4> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Reviewed meetings held since November 20th.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">At the December 3rd board meeting, the board approved all revision requests except NPRR1246 and a related request.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">NPRR1246 and its related request were remanded due to changes in baseline language.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Approval of revision requests NPRR1180 by the PUC occurred in the interim, affecting the baseline.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Suggestion to keep revision requests pending similar situations in the future directed to TAC.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">At the January 16th PUC open meeting, the Public Utility Commission approved all revision requests.</li> </ul> <h3><a href="/sharing/?token=c37579bc-8cf4-491b-8da0-55663920d196">▶️</a> 6 - Board Remand -Vote- TAC Chair</h3> <h4><a href="/sharing/?token=d11eedbe-fd97-45e5-afef-87c584fae02a">▶️</a> 6.01 - NPRR1246, Energy Storage Resource Terminology Alignment for the Single-Model Era</h4> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion to recommend approval of NPRR1246 as recommended by TAC in the 11/20/24 TAC Report as amended by the 1/21/25 ERCOT comments added to the combo ballot.</li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Discussion on NPRR1246, involving the board remand and changes to baseline language.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">ERCOT comments were recently filed and displayed during the meeting.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Kenneth Ragsdale introduced the topic, stating that work began in July 2024.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">The changes are necessary for alignment with the single model and the RTCB project.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">NPRR1188 regarding total dispatch and settlement for CLRs was approved by the PUC.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Four documents are aligned with NPRR1188 for compatibility with the RTCB project.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">No questions or further comments were raised during this agenda item.</li> </ul> </ul> <h4><a href="/sharing/?token=f292c606-06c2-4105-b350-14d088b5555e">▶️</a> 6.02 - NOGRR268, Related to NPRR1246, Energy Storage Resource Terminology Alignment for the Single-Model Era</h4> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion to recommend approval of NOGRR268 as recommended by TAC in the 11/20/24 TAC Report as amended by the 1/21/25 ERCOT comments added to the combo ballot.</li> </ul> <h4><a href="/sharing/?token=4ca3877f-23db-4fd6-b7b0-eeb722f5879a">▶️</a> 6.03 - OBDRR052, Related to NPRR1246, Energy Storage Resource Terminology Alignment for the Single-Model Era</h4> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion to recommend approval of OBDRR052 as recommended by TAC in the 11/20/24 TAC Report as amended by the 1/21/25 ERCOT comments added to the combo ballot.</li> </ul> <h4><a href="/sharing/?token=40b08556-780c-44cb-b913-a91991f0ba1f">▶️</a> 6.04 - PGRR118, Related to NPRR1246, Energy Storage Resource Terminology Alignment for the Single-Model Era</h4> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion to recommend approval of PGRR118 as recommended by TAC in the 11/20/24 TAC Report as amended by the 1/21/25 ERCOT comments added to the combo ballot.</li> </ul> <h3><a href="/sharing/?token=c541ac78-84f5-4f73-8082-c28536ff5adc">▶️</a> 7 - Confirmation of 2025 Subcommittee/Sub Group Leadership -Vote- TAC Chair</h3> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">New leadership appointments include Sandeep Borkar from LTRA to vice chair ROS, Blake Holt from LTRA to chair WMS, and Jett Price from Golden Spread to chair the credit finance subgroup.</li> </ul> <h3><a href="/sharing/?token=301876cb-37c2-4f61-993c-0bb95ab97980">▶️</a> 8 - 2025 TAC Goals -Vote- TAC Chair</h3> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Discussion on the purpose and format of TAC goals, with suggestions for more specificity and relevance to current hot topics.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Eric Goff raised concerns about the broad nature of current goals, questioning the necessity and suggesting a reevaluation.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Martha Henson from Oncor proposed creating a one-page document to consolidate and streamline goals, focusing on mission and action items.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Discussion of how TAC goals should align and interact with subcommittee goals, the need for accountability, and midyear check-ins.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Consensus to not vote on the goals at this meeting and to revisit the topic in February after further refinement of the goals document.</li> </ul> <h3><a href="/sharing/?token=e83ed1e0-f871-42d3-968a-09ef689fd672">▶️</a> 9 - EAL Credit Formula Proposal - Austin Rosel</h3> <a href="/storage/docs/2025/01/EAL%20Credit%20formula%20proposal%20final.pdf">EAL Credit formula proposal final.pdf</a> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">The CFSG has been discussing changes to the EAL credit equation for about 2 years, proposing a simpler adjustment rather than a complete rewrite.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">The proposal is expected to be submitted soon, with the final language reviewed by the CFSG for completeness.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">The EAL formula focuses on capturing real-time and DAM settlements, addressing overcollateralization during price spikes.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">The proposed changes aim to reduce both overcollateralization and undercollateralization, ensuring efficiency without worsening other issues.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">The tweak involves changing how the forward adjustment factor is applied to historical invoices.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">The ERCOT collateral requirements sometimes spike unnecessarily based on the current formula, leading to inefficiencies.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">The proposal aligns historical and forward-looking invoices more directly, helping to prevent double spikes like those seen in events such as winter storm Elliott.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Some expressed concerns about potential undercollateralization but acknowledged the proposal improves these instances.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">The change is seen as correcting inefficiencies without compromising market participant security.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">There is an understanding that while this improves the current system, additional future adjustments may be required.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Stakeholders support the proposal for its prudent approach toward resolving identified issues efficiently.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Implementation of the changes is expected within about a year, seen as a lightweight alteration manageable by ERCOT amidst current projects.</li> </ul> <h3><a href="/sharing/?token=1540b4e9-6397-45b7-8240-fdfe8b8dc85f">▶️</a> 10 - Review of Revision Request Summary/ERCOT Market Impact Statement/Opinions - Ann Boren/ IMM</h3> <a href="/storage/docs/2025/01/Revision%20Request%20Summary%20012225_rev1.pdf">Revision Request Summary 012225_rev1.pdf</a> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Total of 19 revision requests on the TAC agenda this month.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">13 requests fall under general system process improvement.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">2 requests are in the regulatory category.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">1 request is based on the ERCOT board PUC directive.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">2 requests align with strategic plan objective 1.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">1 request aligns with strategic plan objective 2.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Impact of PGRR117 includes a 2 FTE impact.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">PGRR117 has an annual recurring O&M impact of $360-440K</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">NPRR1257 has an impact of less than $10k (O&M).</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">SCR828 has an impact of $50-70K</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">NPRR1253 as presented to PRS has an impact of $50-70k, to be discussed further under the PRS report.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">ERCOT supports all revision requests presented at TAC, with positive market impact statements.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">ERCOT supports NPRR1190; however, NPRR1190 remains on the table this month.</li> </ul> <h3><a href="/sharing/?token=7f1757bc-c0ae-46c2-9209-0e9e91e7329c">▶️</a> 11 - PRS Report - Vote - Diana Coleman</h3> <ol start="11"> <li><a href="/storage/docs/2025/01/11.%20PRS%20Presentation%20to%20TAC%20012225.pdf"> PRS Presentation to TAC 012225.pdf</a></li> </ol> <h4><a href="/sharing/?token=5a88e552-ea6d-4bb8-b7a0-a9f2860e2e8a">▶️</a> 11.01 - NPRR1243, Revision to Requirements for Notice and Release of Protected Information or ECEII to Certain Governmental Authorities</h4> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion to recommend approval of NPRR1243 as recommended by PRS in the 12/12/24 PRS Report added to the combo ballot.</li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">NPRR1243 is tied with the November 14, 2024 PRS report and the July 24th IA.</li> </ul> </ul> <h4><a href="/sharing/?token=a3d01243-e5e7-4fee-9fd2-b118c135d3b3">▶️</a> 11.02 - NPRR1250, RPS Mandatory Program Termination</h4> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion to recommend approval of NPRR1250 as recommended by PRS in the 12/12/24 PRS Report with a recommended effective date of September 1, 2025 carries with one abstention.</li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Ned Bonskowski expressed concerns regarding NPRR1250, mentioning the retention of compliance premiums and a three compliance period banking provision, stating these were unnecessary without a statutory framework.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Ned Bonskowski stated his intention to abstain from the vote on NPRR1250.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Anne Boren mentioned previous comments discussing the PRS and suggested a recommended effective date of September 1, 2025, for NPRR1250.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">A ballot was conducted for NPRR1250, with a motion from Bill Barnes and a second from Brian Stamm, resulting in a motion that carried with one abstention from Ned Bonskowski.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Discussion hinted at the need for another NPRR to address further changes concerning the RPS termination.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">No further questions or comments were raised regarding NPRR1250 after the ballot.</li> </ul> </ul> <img src="/storage/docs/2025/01/1-23-2025-TAC-NPRR1250-Ballot.png" width="802" height="892" /> <h4><a href="/sharing/?token=f9b93dcd-9910-4792-a0de-750650103dc7">▶️</a> 11.03 - NPRR1251, Updated FFSS Fuel Replacement Costs Recovery Process</h4> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion to recommend approval of NPRR1251 as recommended by PRS in the 1/15/25 PRS Report added to the combo ballot.</li> </ul> <h4><a href="/sharing/?token=c4a3ec9c-0d5b-4ed4-8735-2ae32b4d5532">▶️</a> 11.04 - NPRR1252, Pre-notice for Sharing of Some Information, Addition of Research and Innovation Partner, Clarifying Notice Requirements</h4> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion to recommend approval of NPRR1252 as recommended by PRS in the 12/12/24 PRS Report added to the combo ballot.</li> </ul> <h4><a href="/sharing/?token=253999d7-45f8-47f5-b793-fe0e20423fe8">▶️</a> 11.05 - NPRR1253, Incorporate ESR Charging Load Information into ICCP</h4> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion to recommend approval of NPRR1253 as recommended by PRS in the 1/15/25 PRS Report added to the combo ballot.</li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">ERCOT had a discussion in January about difficulties in implementing the requested changes by summer.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">ERCOT identified a solution to provide ESR charging telemetry for a 4CP offset via a public API.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">The solution won't change PRS-approved language and aims for implementation by 2025.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">The API will make ESR charging information public, not just for entities with resources.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">ERCOT's implementation plan is expected to not interfere with RTC resources.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">The initiative was recognized as an enhancement over the current availability on ERCOT's dashboard.</li> </ul> </ul> <h4><a href="/sharing/?token=c84d2c5a-648d-4f16-9b0c-748321e98308">▶️</a> 11.06 - NPRR1257, Limit on Amount of RRS a Resource can Provide Using Primary Frequency Response</h4> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion  To recommend approval of NPRR1257 as recommended by PRS in the 1/15/25 PRS Report added to the combo ballot.</li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">NPRR1257 was unanimously voted on and forwarded to TAC with the December 12th PRS report.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">An Impact Assessment (IA) from October 21st was noted, with an IA of less than $10k and a low priority rate.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">A system change request associated with NPRR1257 was noted, with a cost estimate of $50k and $70k and a suggested priority of 2025, and was unanimously endorsed.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">A combo ballot was proposed for NPRR1257 and SPR 828, recommending their approval as outlined in the 1/15 PRS report.</li> </ul> </ul> <h4><a href="/sharing/?token=362a8a98-33cb-4d20-8bab-2955817da033">▶️</a> 11.07 - NPRR1258, TSP Performance Monitoring Update</h4> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion to recommend approval of NPRR1258 as recommended by PRS in the 12/12/24 PRS Report added to the combo ballot.</li> </ul> <h4><a href="/sharing/?token=fa7804d4-8934-44ce-a32a-6ecb9808e425">▶️</a> 11.08 - NPRR1259, Update Section 15 Level Response Language</h4> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion to recommend approval of NPRR1259 as recommended by PRS in the 1/15/25 PRS Report added to the combo ballot.</li> </ul> <h4><a href="/sharing/?token=9e15282e-6d1f-49a9-ac41-b12228c70a12">▶️</a> 11.09 - NPRR1260, Corrections for CLR Requirements Inadvertently Removed</h4> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion to recommend approval of NPRR1260 as recommended by PRS in the 1/15/25 PRS Report added to the combo ballot.</li> </ul> <h4><a href="/sharing/?token=6cd2355d-ffd6-49a2-b31f-119a12952678">▶️</a> 11.10 - NPRR1261, Operational Flexibility for CRR Auction Transaction Limits</h4> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion to recommend approval of NPRR1261 as recommended by PRS in the 1/15/25 PRS Report added to the combo ballot.</li> </ul> <h4><a href="/sharing/?token=6b78baf2-ac90-4c05-9e4f-464cf64e2841">▶️</a> 11.11 - SCR828, Increase the Number of Resource Certificates Permitted for an Email Domain in RIOO</h4> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion to recommend approval of SCR828 as recommended by PRS in the 1/15/25 PRS Report added to the combo ballot.</li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">SCR828 IA reported between $50k and $70k</li> </ul> </ul> <h3><a href="/sharing/?token=308ba1d8-e1b8-4ae9-b415-a29be65a22d3">▶️</a> 12 - Revision Requests Tabled at TAC -Possible Vote- TAC Chair</h3> <h4><a href="/sharing/?token=83970f6e-e0de-4f9d-9246-6be1f3a76a99">▶️</a> 12.01 - NPRR1190, High Dispatch Limit Override Provision for Increased Load Serving Entity Costs</h4> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">The NPRR1190 item is currently tabled at ERCOT, with discussion ongoing at WMS and WMWG. Update given by Blake Holt.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">A compromise solution has been proposed that includes a review and potential modification of the protocol if excessive costs arise from the eligibility expansion on HDL override payments.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">The current feedback is generally positive, with vocal parties supporting the compromise, but consumers require more time to review the language.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">The recommendation is for interested parties to prepare feedback for the January 30th WMWG meeting to advance the proposal.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Eric Goff mentioned that evaluation of the proposal is ongoing, and there's consideration for a counterproposal, indicating active discussion and consideration among stakeholders.</li> </ul> <h4><a href="/sharing/?token=8505ecb8-50f8-48f1-8484-44dd63391e9d">▶️</a> 12.02 - NOGRR264, Related to NPRR1235, Dispatchable Reliability Reserve Service as a Stand-Alone Ancillary Service</h4> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Decision to keep NOGRR264 tabled while awaiting developments on NPRR1235.</li> </ul> <h3><a href="/sharing/?token=4be73708-4465-4169-bab4-f404f38e5690">▶️</a> 13 - RMS Report - Debbie McKeever</h3> <a href="/storage/docs/2025/01/2025-01-22%20RMS%20update%20to%20TAC%20final.pdf">2025-01-22 RMS update to TAC final.pdf</a> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Election of RMS leadership: John Schatz elected as vice chair, and Debbie McKeever as chair.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">RMGRR182 related to NPRR1264 was tabled, pending PRS review.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Two task forces were sunsetted: Lubbock Retail Integration Task Force and Market Coordination Team.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">The Lubbock Retail Integration Task Force completed its work as LP&L is now in retail competition, with ongoing stabilization efforts related to billing and usage.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Lubbock data expected to be available on Smart Meter Texas soon.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">The Market Coordination Team managed large version releases of Texas SET and several RMGRRs and NPRRs.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Implementation of a transactional solution for the MarkeTrak (SCR817) to address inadvertent gains.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Works in progress includes activities by the Profiling Working Group and Retail Market Training Task Force.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Ongoing updates and training to align with Texas SET version 5.0.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Consideration from TDTMS of changes to Switch Hold language due to potential ERCOT outages during business hours.</li> </ul> <h3><a href="/sharing/?token=6a80cb7c-644a-437b-b6f2-3d1c2e99bc8d">▶️</a> 14 - ROS Report - Vote - Katie Rich</h3> <a href="/storage/docs/2025/01/ROS_Update_to_TAC%201%2022%2024.pdf">ROS_Update_to_TAC 1 22 24.pdf</a> <h4><a href="/sharing/?token=3c28dc9e-df05-4b79-8226-db8f1c1b8134">▶️</a> 14.1 - PGRR117, Addition of Resiliency Assessment and Criteria to Reflect PUCT Rule Changes</h4> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion To recommend approval of PGRR117 as recommended by ROS in the 12/5/24 ROS Report added to the combo ballot.</li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">PGRR117 is a result of changes to TAC § 25.101, aiming to conduct a biannual assessment of ERCOT Power Grids reliability and resiliency.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">PGRR117 is ready to move forward and is up for voting.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Several action items need to be closed out, including a TAC assignment related to the EEA 2 event in 2023 and outstanding KTC assignments.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">NPRR1264 with 3 associated revision requests tabled at ROS, work expected at WMS.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Update expected at ROS for PGRR121, related to NOGRR272 Advanced Grid Support Requirements for Inverter-Based ESRs; a presentation is being prepared.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Next meeting scheduled for February 6th via Webex due to busy schedules with board meetings and WMS.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Confirmation that the biannual resiliency assessment will be separate from the RTP and conducted every two years.</li> </ul> </ul> <h4><a href="/sharing/?token=e4d237fa-c5e3-427b-a35d-f4d8d814807d">▶️</a> 14.2 - NOGRR271, Related to NPRR1257, Limit on Amount of RRS a Resource can Provide Using Primary Frequency Response</h4> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion To recommend approval of NOGRR271 as recommended by ROS in the 1/9/25 ROS Report added to the combo ballot.</li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">NOGRR271 already approved under PRS agenda.</li> </ul> </ul> <h3><a href="/sharing/?token=578f8e0a-02df-4fa1-bb4e-7b8ad71a4d21">▶️</a> 15 - WMS Report - Blake Holt</h3> <a href="/storage/docs/2025/01/WMS%20Report%20to%20TAC%20-%20January%2022%202025.pdf">WMS Report to TAC - January 22 2025.pdf</a> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Received the first stakeholder touch point on energy attribute certificate program, requested PRS table the NPRR for further discussion.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Reviewed status of tabled NPRRs, including proposal options for DRRS to be discussed at SAWG meeting.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">EDF intends to file additional comments to NPRR1070, some overlap with NPRR1247; EDF seeks clearer procedural documentation.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Update on NPRR1202 about large load interconnection study fees, ERCOT reviewing proposed fees, could be included in NPRR1234.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">NPRR1241 approved, modifies firm fuel standby fee clawback functionality.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">NPRR1200 withdrawn, to be resolved by SMOGGR028.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Discussion of remaining topics for the year, no detailed debate on next steps.</li> </ul> <h3><a href="/sharing/?token=2ac7cca6-e01b-44c6-acbc-5888699922ff">▶️</a> 16 - Credit Finance Sub Group Report - CFSG Chair</h3> <a href="/storage/docs/2025/01/TAC_CFSG_23Jan2025.pdf">TAC_CFSG_23Jan2025.pdf</a> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Introduction of current chair and vice-chair.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Meetings were held on December 19th and January 17th.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Voted on operational NPRRs without credit impacts and endorsed EHA change proposal.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Provided regular credit exposure updates.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Market-wide potential credit exposure increased to $1.76 billion in December.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Forward adjustment factors rose at the end of December due to an upcoming January cold front.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Real-time and day-ahead prices remained stable.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Discretionary collateral increased slightly from $3.82 billion in October to $3.98 billion in December.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">No unusual collateral call activity reported.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Graphs showed credit exposure and discretionary collateral data over the time period.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Presented overall letter of credit amounts at financial institutions.</li> </ul> <h3><a href="/sharing/?token=27c890ee-ef52-4138-868e-b98a2975728e">▶️</a> 17 - RTC+B Task Force Report - Matt Mereness</h3> <a href="/storage/docs/2025/01/RTCBTF_TAC_Update_01222025.pdf">RTCBTF_TAC_Update_01222025.pdf</a> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Provided a standard update, highlighting key issues and risks being addressed.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Delivered a sandbox environment for market trials on telemetry build out and initial market submissions, aiming for enhanced readiness by March-April.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Discussed current issues, focusing on 4 NPRR policy issues, AS demand curves, and clean-up revision requests related to AS qualification.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Elaborated on the 4 in 1 NPRR dealing with ramp rate sharing, AS proxy offer floor, demand curves in RUC tools, and AS duration requirements.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Addressed need to explicitly qualify resources for AS to avoid unintended offers, emphasizing no system changes required.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Discussed IMM's published sensitivity analysis on 3 AS demand curves and related NPRR draft language.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Highlighted ongoing RTC study re-evaluating the efficiency of cost savings with monetary estimates provided.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Resource level data from studies shared for in-house analysis by stakeholders.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Outlined the publication and details of the market trials handbook with no negative feedback reported.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Mentioned NPRR1253 clarifying the inexistence of battery charging as it affects 4CP post RTC go live.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Outlined plans to file 3 NPRRs: 4 policy changes, AS qualification, and IMM-sponsored ASDC modifications with a timeline targeting February 12th for discussions.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Stressed the importance of refactoring AS demand curves prior to the May market trials environment.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Announced availability of RTC basic education material, including a 37-minute video useful for staff training.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Scheduled half-day meeting for 01/23 to further discussions on NPRR language and study queries.</li> </ul> <h3><a href="/sharing/?token=ee8835d8-36bb-494b-b40f-0027a8bc3552">▶️</a> 18 - ERCOT Reports</h3> <h4><a href="/sharing/?token=dcadba14-bcc5-4b72-b6ef-81e2cc3a947a">▶️</a> 18.01 - Market Design Framework Discussion Keith Collins</h4> <a href="/storage/docs/2025/01/KCollins%20Market%20Design%20Framework%20Feedback%20-%20TAC%20Final.pdf">KCollins Market Design Framework Feedback - TAC Final.pdf</a> <a href="/storage/docs/2025/01/Vistra%20Market%20Design%20Framework%20Comments.pdf">Vistra Market Design Framework Comments.pdf</a> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">The framework originated from board conversations and stakeholder comments and is grounded in ERCOT's strategic plan.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Emphasis was placed on the balance between reliability and affordability, suggesting cost should always be considered.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Stakeholders provided 6 sets of comments on the framework, focusing on purpose, reliability-affordability balance, and further refinements.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Commenters acknowledged the role of competitiveness and affordability in market design.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Ned Bonskowski and Vistra Luminant supported the framework but emphasized clarifying its purpose and avoiding resetting past market design progress.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Suggestions were made for using the framework to improve stakeholder processes and communicate priorities.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Concerns were raised regarding reliance on reliable standards and how the framework could potentially guide market design decisions.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Issues such as the importance of competitive markets, predicting market stability, and openness to technology were highlighted.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Several stakeholders questioned the purpose and intent of the framework, urging clarity before further development.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Some stakeholders suggested there’s a need for ERCOT to push beyond just implementing policy and act as a feedback mechanism.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">The discussion included views on how ERCOT's role should be defined in terms of policy implementation versus policy setting.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Next steps involve further refinement of the framework, clarification of purpose and intent, and potentially using examples for clarity.</li> </ul> <h4>Next Steps</h4> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Refine the presentation based on received feedback, focusing on clarifying intent and incorporating specific attributes like competitiveness.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Further discussions will be planned, with a possibility of a workshop to gather more feedback and involve more stakeholders.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">A future presentation will aim to present a clearer purpose and potential real-life examples to illustrate the framework's applicability.</li> </ul> <h4><a href="/sharing/?token=de10d584-7fef-4b1c-bef2-3a7abb9bc17d">▶️</a> 18.02 - Proposed Changes to Ancillary Service Methodology for 2025 associated with NPRR1257 -Possible Vote- Nitika Mago</h4> <a href="/storage/docs/2025/01/ERCOT%20Methodologies%20for%20Determining%20Minimum%20AS%20Requirements%20Redlines%20for%20NPRR1257.pdf">ERCOT Methodologies for Determining Minimum AS Requirements Redlines for NPRR1257.pdf</a> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion to endorse the 2025 Ancillary Service Methodology as presented by ERCOT added to the combo ballot.</li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Proposed changes to the AS methodology are due to NPRR1257 and NOGRR271.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">The NPRR1257 established a framework for identifying the maximum amount of RRS a single resource could provide.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Based on prior analysis and workshops, the proposed maximum amount of RRS using Primary Frequency Response that a single Resource can provide is limited to 157 MW.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">The proposed AS methodology change is aimed to be approved along with the NPRR.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">No material impact expected on the amount of responsive reserve procurement quantities.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Plan to endorse the 2025 AS methodology as presented by ERCOT.</li> </ul> </ul> <h4><a href="/sharing/?token=ae7b0b4a-d331-400a-a8b2-cfa9751e75b3">▶️</a> 18.03 - Annual RUC Reporting Requirement -Protocol Section 5.8- Ryan King</h4> <a href="/storage/docs/2025/01/Annual%20Review%20of%20the%20Market%20Impacts%20of%20RUCs_updated.pdf">Annual Review of the Market Impacts of RUCs_updated.pdf</a> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Reduction in RUC for 2024 compared to previous years: 1800 resource-hours in 2024 vs. 2500 in 2023 and 7900 in 2022.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Contributing factors: changes in price expectations, lower average fuel prices, increased online capacity from solar and energy storage.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">April and October had the highest unit commitments in 2024, spread over several days.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Increase in RUC for congestion, particularly in the last three months of 2024.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Discussion on NPRR1092 changes affecting opt-out opportunities for resources when issued RUC orders.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Observed decrease in the amount of resources able to opt-out due to timeline constraints.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Questions raised about discrepancies between opt-out and non-opt-out commitments, impact of pricing goals, and issues with the RUC timeline.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Concerns about the NPRR1092 affecting the ability of resources to opt out post RUC order.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Suggestion to add an action item for further discussion of opt-out limitations and NPRR1092 implications.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Discussion on the impact of DRRS on RUC reductions and how resource hours could be compared to megawatt procurement.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Highlighting the clear discrepancy in opt-out percentages and the impact of timeline restrictions.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Longer-term solution proposed for recognizing fuel transportation costs and dynamic gas contracts.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Concerns over exceptional fuel cost process after NPRR1177 sunset.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Recommendation to coordinate further discussions at future WMWG meetings regarding specific high RUC instances.</li> </ul> <h4><a href="/sharing/?token=9f39e7fb-e1c0-4ae9-a350-95d01d86db4a">▶️</a> 18.04 - Large Load Interconnection Status Update Julie Snitman</h4> <a href="/storage/docs/2025/01/LLI%20Queue%20Status%20Update%20-%202025-1.pdf">LLI Queue Status Update - 2025-1.pdf</a> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">A methodology update was implemented to include more granular data on ramp schedules.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">The queue now stands at about 80 gigawatts, showing an increase from the November meeting.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Changes anticipated in PGRR115 and NPRR1234 have influenced the queue increase.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Granular data now includes approved energized peak values and current monthly peaks.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">TSP partners play a crucial role in updating ramp schedules and providing up-to-date data.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Several projects have anticipated energization dates extending two years out.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Discussion on observed versus approved to energize but not operational figures.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Concerns raised regarding the difference between observed energized figures and simultaneous peaks.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Inquiries about how ramp schedules affect load interconnection studies were raised.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Increased reporting and transparency expected post-NPRR1234 and PGRR115 passage.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Load zones distinguished between West and other load zones.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Observed a decrease in non-simultaneous peak load, initiating internal tracking.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Suggestions for additional data visibility on flexible vs. non-flexible loads.</li> </ul> <h4>Questions and Issues Raised:</h4> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Clarification on how granularity impacts resource adequacy reporting.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Understanding the impact of PGRR115 and NPRR1234 on current load connection processes.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Inquiries into the criteria for a project to be included in the large load queue.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Concerns about approved projects remaining in non-operational status for extended periods.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Discussions on how colocated sources are defined and the implications thereof.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Request for further breakdown of load zones in future reports.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Questions about transparency of load interconnection studies.</li> </ul> <h4><a href="/sharing/?token=7b3bad07-e294-4e7e-8a6e-c0b6562853eb">▶️</a> 18.05 - ERCOT Board/Stakeholder Engagement Update - Rebecca Zerwas</h4> <a href="/storage/docs/2025/01/Board%20Stakeholder%20Engagement%20Update%20(1.25%20TAC).pdf">Board Stakeholder Engagement Update (1.25 TAC).pdf</a> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Expansion of directors to include four ex officio directors to provide additional in-person opportunities for member companies.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Participation survey sent to WMS, ROS, and TAC representatives, with requests for responses to schedule meetings for calendar certainty.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Coordination of briefings with board chair, vice-chair, and R&M chair.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Introduction of a new initiative to discuss broader policy initiatives at the board level with the R&M committee involvement.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Plan to target transmission planning in April and RTC in September, with selected segments invited to present perspectives.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Format proposed for R&M includes a 20-minute presentation by 2-3 segments per topic, allowing for broad policy discussions outside specific NPRRs.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Interactive Q&A anticipated during presentations.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">An educational approach suggested for presentations to highlight unique insights that ERCOT board may not be aware of.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Potential coordination across segments to avoid duplication of materials.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Further discussions to continue in February regarding the specifics of the segments involved.</li> </ul> <h4><a href="/sharing/?token=a567df59-1cb2-49b7-b2ee-767c1d7c92bb">▶️</a> 18.06 - Oncor Venus Switch to Sam Switch 345-kV Line Project - Possible Vote - Prabhu Gnanam</h4> <a href="/storage/docs/2025/01/Oncor%20Venus%20Switch%20to%20Sam%20Switch%20345-kV%20Line%20Project_EIR_TAC_January_2025.pdf">Oncor Venus Switch to Sam Switch 345-kV Line Project_EIR_TAC_January_2025.pdf</a> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion to endorse the Oncor Venus Switch to Sam Switch 345-kV Line Regional Planning Group Project (Option 1) added to the combo ballot.</li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Three Oncor projects were discussed; focus here on Venus to Sam's switch project.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Project classified as a tier 1 project with an estimated cost of $118.9 million.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">SSR impacts and system congestion impact assessed without significant issues found.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Recommendation made for option 1 to address reliability needs; project expected by May 2026.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Details provided about upgrades: 38 miles of 345-kV line upgrade with an emergency rating of 1792 MVA.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">The project to be added to the combo ballot for a potential vote.</li> </ul> </ul> <h4><a href="/sharing/?token=5d22306f-0802-4c40-b53a-255a2d31c8c6">▶️</a> 18.07 - Oncor Wilmer 345/138-kV Switch Project - Possible Vote</h4> <a href="/storage/docs/2025/01/Oncor%20Wilmer%20345138-kV%20Switch%20Project_EIR_TAC_January_2025.pdf">Oncor Wilmer 345138-kV Switch Project_EIR_TAC_January_2025.pdf</a> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion to endorse the Oncor Wilmer 345/138-kV Switch Regional Planning Group Project (Option 1) added to the combo ballot.</li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Second project discussed: Oncor Wilmer project with an estimated cost of $158.2 million.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Wilmer project requires CCN and addresses reliability in the Dallas area's weather zone.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Option 1 recommended for Wilmer project due to least cost and minimal right of way required.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Project overview includes multiple upgrades to stations and breaker systems, expected by May 2026.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Endorsement sought for Oncor Wilmer 345/138 kV switch project, particularly option 1.</li> </ul> </ul> <h4><a href="/sharing/?token=e84a5c4d-fd32-4614-aae0-b533e0c23ffc">▶️</a> 18.08 - Oncor Forney 345/138-kV Switch Rebuild Project - Possible Vote</h4> <a href="/storage/docs/2025/01/Oncor%20Forney%20345138-kV%20Switch%20Rebuild%20Project%20_EIR_TAC_January_2025.pdf">Oncor Forney 345138-kV Switch Rebuild Project _EIR_TAC_January_2025.pdf</a> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion to endorse the Oncor Forney 345/138-kV Switch Rebuild Regional Planning Group Project (Option 1A) added to the combo ballot.</li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Includes 15 new 345-kV breakers, 10 138-kV breakers, and a second 345/138-kV autotransformer (750 MVA emergency rating).</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Connecting the 138-kV double circuit to the new transformer.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Estimated project cost is $103.5 million, with an updated estimate of $100.4 million.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Expected to enter service by December 2025.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Addresses overload issues under N-1 conditions.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Improves long-term load-serving capability and resolves aging infrastructure issues.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Five options were analyzed, reduced to four feasible options.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">ERCOT recommended Option 1A as the least-cost, most effective solution.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Original station equipment dates back to the 1960s (confirmed by Oncor).</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Sub-synchronous assessment found no impacts.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Condition and sensitivity analyses found no issues with new generation and load scaling.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">ERCOT recommends endorsing the revised Option 1A for the project.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Suggestion made to add the project to the combo ballot for approval.</li> </ul> </ul> <h3><a href="/sharing/?token=c56b92e9-bf31-490f-8711-a9edc3f52a38">▶️</a> 19 - Other Business - TAC Chair</h3> <h4><a href="/sharing/?token=a1554cdc-7bf4-4914-98e8-2adaf073b15f">▶️</a> 19.1 - Working Group/Task Force Meeting Management/Agendas</h4> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Reminder for working groups and task forces to post agendas and materials a week before meetings.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Subcommittees and technical advisory committees usually comply due to market rule support.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">The February meeting moved to Thursday, February 27th.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Membership workshop scheduled for Friday, February 14th, to discuss segment membership changes under ERCOT bylaws.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Proposals for membership changes should be emailed by February 4th to membership@ercot.com.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Agenda for the workshop will be sent out on February 7th through a market notice.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Proposals can be submitted in any convenient format and will be presented in order received.</li> </ul> <h3><a href="/sharing/?token=1228c879-74cc-40b8-ab8f-ce49d28035e4">▶️</a> 20 - Combo Ballot - Vote - TAC Chair</h3> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion to approve the combo ballot as presented passed unanimously with no abstentions.</li> </ul> <img src="/storage/docs/2025/01/01-23-2025-TAC-ComboItems.png" width="804" height="368" /> <img src="/storage/docs/2025/01/01-23-2025-TAC-ComboResults.png" width="803" height="894" /> <h3><a href="/sharing/?token=0dd2a46e-fafe-43c8-8f03-e0545a6cd025">▶️</a> 21 - Adjourn</h3>