Frame

Meeting Summary - 11/14/24 PRS Meeting

Grid Monitor AI
11/15/2024

<h2><img src="https://dash2.gridmonitor.com/storage/docs/2024/11/11142024%20PRS%20Hero.png" width="865" height="649" /></h2> <h2><a href="/sharing/?token=748c2b3d-5c20-4727-966d-54bb6468f4eb">1</a> - Antitrust Admonition - Diana Coleman</h2> <h2><a href="/sharing/?token=d579b7f3-68cf-4edf-84fb-0f32a65d2ef9">2</a> - Approval of Minutes - Vote - Diana Coleman</h2> <h3><a href="/sharing/?token=cb70f4aa-c4cd-47b4-8447-70da486a044c">2.1</a> - October 17, 2024</h3> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion to approve the October 17, 2024, PRS Meeting Minutes as presented added to the combo ballot.</li> </ul> <h2><a href="/sharing/?token=52a0792d-5d13-4fbc-8b45-259fb1c41d4d">3</a> - TAC Update - Diana Coleman</h2> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">TAC approved three proposals: NPRR1245, NPRR1197, and NPRR1249.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">NPRR1180 was tabled by TAC and will be reconsidered with PGRR107.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">TAC decision on NPRR1180 is pending until PGRR107 progresses.</li> </ul> <h2><a href="/sharing/?token=d9927dea-73d6-4abf-9e90-f56954a47c38">4</a> - Project Update - Troy Anderson</h2> <a href="https://dash2.gridmonitor.com/storage/docs/2024/11/prs_november_2024_project_update.pdf">prs_november_2024_project_update.pdf</a> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Major projects have been added back as requested.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Working on FTE analysis for a future meeting.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Ideas to improve capacity for revision requests are being considered.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">November updates: Second Part of 1205 and 1218 for the REC program went live, and Texas SET was smoothly implemented.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">NPRR1231 is going live tomorrow, as notified in market notices.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">December updates include: wrapping up NPRR1217, final piece of SCR799 relating to export functionality, and some RIOO updates in NPRR1184.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">PGRR082 part of December release; PGRR088 moved to January.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Reporting on projects is aligned with Matt Mereness' RTC reporting.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Major project slide updated for RTC go live in late 2025, and stabilization into 2026.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">NPRR1023 with CRR on hold for process improvements.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Discussion about future projects DRRS and PCM, less resource demanding compared to RTC.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">NPRR1219 concerning CDR not explicitly noted; will be addressed offline.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">DRRS implementation project might start in Q4 2025, not going live then.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">December go-live target for NPRR945 on the 18th.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Revised IAs and priorities/ranks posted for discussion in future agenda items.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">TWG meets monthly for technical discussions; technical teams are encouraged to participate.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Acknowledgments for ERCOT and market participants for successfully implementing Texas SET.</li> </ul> <h1><a href="/sharing/?token=6a6e5fb2-2d51-4c93-ab4a-cc0614071833">5</a> - Review PRS Reports, Impact Analyses, and Prioritization - Vote - denotes no impact - Diana Coleman</h1> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Four items are up for impact analysis and prioritization: items 1239 and 1240 have revised Impact Assessments.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">The goal is to move reports from the secure portion of ERCOT to the public-facing webpage.</li> </ul> <h2><a href="/sharing/?token=f2b038ce-db69-42ff-b9d4-080726296c37">5.1</a> - NPRR1239, Access to Market Information</h2> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion to endorse and forward to TAC the 10/17/24 PRS Report and 10/29/24 Revised Impact for NPRR1239 with a recommended priority of 2025 and rank of 4540 added to the combo ballot.</li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Costs for NPRR1239 and time requirements for project implementation were presented.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Costs to build out APIs were removed to be aligned with other ERCOT API work in 2025 for efficiency.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">The initiative seeks to convert 63 reports from secure to public status.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Implementation will depend on potential impacts with RTC, with hopes to progress in parallel.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Priority was adjusted from 26 to 25, aiming for completion in 2025, with a consistent rank as both items will be handled together.</li> </ul> </ul> <h2><a href="/sharing/?token=247145c7-c697-4376-8be6-06e19d7d8fa3">5.2</a> - NPRR1240, Access to Transmission Planning Information</h2> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion to endorse and forward to TAC the 10/17/24 PRS Report and 10/29/24 Revised Impact for NPRR1240 with a recommended priority of 2025 and rank of 4540 added to the combo ballot.</li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Discussion on combining NPRR1239 and NPRR1240 on the combo ballot.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Consensus reached with no objections noted.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Acknowledgment and confirmation to add items 1239 and 1240 to the meeting minutes.</li> </ul> </ul> <h2><a href="/sharing/?token=6094ca12-027e-446d-a4cc-83815dd9fc32">5.3</a> - NPRR1246, Energy Storage Resource Terminology Alignment for the Single-Model Era*</h2> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion to endorse and forward to TAC the 10/17/24 PRS Report and 7/31/24 Impact Analysis for NPRR1246 added to the combo ballot.</li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Discussed NPRR1246 regarding Energy Storage Resource (ESR) terminology alignment.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Preparation for RTC initiative scheduled for next year.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">No costs associated with the implementation.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Previous unanimous vote to recommend language approval.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Acknowledged amendments by September 20th ERCOT comments.</li> </ul> </ul> <h2><a href="/sharing/?token=b523c5b7-35c3-4221-83be-ce3f37b864e2">5.4</a> - NPRR1254, Modeling Deadline for Initial Submission of Resource Registration Data*</h2> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion to endorse and forward to TAC the 10/17/24 PRS Report and 10/2/24 Impact Analysis for NPRR1254 added to the combo ballot.</li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Final topic from ERCOT discussed was regarding the modeling deadline for initial submission of resource registration data.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Proposal to modify the timeline by extending it one month.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Purpose is to allow ERCOT and resource entities time to ensure submissions are error-free.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">No cost or project is associated with this change.</li> </ul> </ul> <h1><a href="/sharing/?token=53a07b2a-95d7-4c6f-b091-fc56bf7aea93">6</a> - Revision Requests Tabled at PRS </h1>   <h2><a href="/sharing/?token=f6639fe0-b51f-4ace-9d87-2c3ba0c9d983">6.03</a> - NPRR1200, Utilization of Calculated Values for Non-WSL for ESRs</h2> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Discussion on NPRR1200 focused on utilizing calculated values for non-wholesale storage load for Energy Storage Resources (ESRs).</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Item was previously discussed at the Wholesale Market Subcommittee (WMS) last week.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">A motion was made to revisit this item in the next month and to bring it to the Metering Working Group.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">The Metering Working Group has a scheduled meeting on the 20th where further discussions on NPRR1200 are expected to take place.</li> </ul> <h2><a href="/sharing/?token=fb727595-ec7a-41ec-98f1-2d2cdfb04a17">6.04</a> - NPRR1202, Refundable Deposits for Large Load Interconnection Studies</h2> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">WMWG has been reviewing this agenda item.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Comments were filed after last month's PRS meeting.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Decision needed on whether those who filed comments want to address them or keep the item tabled.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Reminder noted that if item remains tabled, no immediate action is required.</li> </ul> <h2><a href="/sharing/?token=0fe08628-1154-45b5-b213-ce518fbc2c35">6.05</a> - NPRR1214, Reliability Deployment Price Adder Fix to Provide Locational Price Signals, Reduce Uplift and Risk</h2> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">CMWG is still reviewing NPRR1214 for an additional month.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">The item will be reconsidered by WMS in December.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Joint comments were filed earlier in response to ERCOT's August 9 comments.</li> </ul> <h2><a href="/sharing/?token=8d064619-85a1-48b6-816a-43e4f7b2cacf">6.06</a> - NPRR1226, Demand Response Monitor</h2> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Technology Working Group will be addressing NPRR1226.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Further discussions are expected in the next PRS meeting on NPRR1226.</li> </ul> <h2><a href="/sharing/?token=2c26672a-4420-4741-ae87-d1853f29564d">6.07</a> - NPRR1229, Real-Time Constraint Management Plan Energy Payment</h2> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Comments were filed on NPRR1229.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Bill Barnes provided an update on agenda item 1202 and 1234.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">ERCOT expressed a desire to move forward with item 1234 while continuing to address concerns with 1202.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Proposal to combine fee structures from Longhorn comments on 1202 with 1234.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">ERCOT is interested in the idea of combining components from the two.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Comments have been shared with ERCOT staff regarding the potential combination.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">PRS members informed about the ongoing discussion regarding the integration of components.</li> </ul> <h2><a href="/sharing/?token=96563f71-0795-42c4-8dd7-36821572e4fc">6.08</a> - NPRR1234, Interconnection Requirements for Large Loads and Modeling Standards for Loads 25 MW or Greater</h2> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">ERCOT filed some comments earlier in the week regarding NPRR1234.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Conversations about these comments are ongoing and expected to continue between 1202 and 1234.</li> </ul> <h2><a href="/sharing/?token=9617e3cf-2908-4a7f-93b7-80a955f17ef6">6.09</a> - NPRR1235, Dispatchable Reliability Reserve Service as a Stand-Alone Ancillary Service</h2> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">NPRR1235 was initially tabled in June and referred to ROS and WMS.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">The item remains tabled at SAWG awaiting possible PUC discussion.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">The item is also still under discussion at WMS.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Recent comments were filed by Luminant for NPRR1235.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Ongoing discussions are taking place regarding NPRR1235.</li> </ul> <h2><a href="/sharing/?token=4931e031-c4cf-41f7-b37a-fdc8813ac58a">6.10</a> - NPRR1238, Voluntary Registration of Loads with Curtailable Load Capabilities</h2> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Comments were submitted by Steel Mills regarding the definition for VECL sat the end of last month.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">WMS may take action on these comments.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Further developments are anticipated in December.</li> </ul> <h2><a href="/sharing/?token=8e6bb5fc-4faf-4e53-ab2f-918a27f0cb5b">6.13</a> - NPRR1243, Revision to Requirements for Notice and Release of Protected Information or ECEII to Certain Governmental Authorities</h2> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion to recommend approval of NPRR1243 as amended by the 10/10/24 ERCOT comments added to the combo ballot.</li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Oncor filed comments proposing a streamlined notification process for ERCOT disclosures to FERC, NURC, and TRE.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">No new comments were filed on NPRR1243, and the committee considered moving the Oncor comments forward on a combo ballot.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">There was discussion about the language concerning compliance premiums not being awarded after December 31, 2024, and the potential need for an earlier effective date.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Introduction of a new concept of a research and innovation partner by ERCOT, with suggestions to provide visibility into shared information via a website.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Oncor's initial concerns about transparency in information disclosure were addressed through a compromise solution.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">A suggestion was made to strike the use of 'fax' from notification methods, aligning with modern communication practices.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Doug Fawn flagged a future NPRR to clean up standard form agreements regarding fax notification, projected for January.</li> </ul> </ul> <h2><a href="/sharing/?token=d6754231-1987-4f9f-81f5-ab87495367cf">6.14</a> - NPRR1247, Incorporation of Congestion Cost Savings Test in Economic Evaluation of Transmission Projects</h2> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion to grant NPRR1247 Urgent status; to recommend approval of NPRR1247 as amended by the 11/11/24 ERCOT comments; and to forward to TAC NPRR1247 and the 8/9/24 Impact Analysis carries: 86% approval 13% opposition and 4 abstentions.</li> </ul> <img src="/storage/docs/2024/11/20241114%20PRS%20ballot%20NPRR1247.png" width="870" height="750" /> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">NPRR1247 concerns a congestion cost savings test discussed extensively since it was filed in August.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">The proposal was approved at ROS with 11 abstentions and several no votes due to contentions over protocol references.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">ERCOT prefers revising the NPRR description rather than including references to two related white papers in protocol language.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">A special planning group workshop and several comments have been considered in the development of NPRR1247.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Urgency is required to proceed with NPRR1247 due to its significant impact on congestion cost savings.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Matt Arthur from ERCOT filed comments on Nov 11 recommending revisions in the revision description referring to two supporting white papers.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">ERCOT’s stance on white papers is that they are non-binding documents providing operational details without stakeholder approval, differing from binding protocol language.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Martha Henson expressed support for keeping NPRR1247 out of protocol references and motioned for its urgency and approval, which was seconded.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Comments were shared expressing concerns about the expedited process and potential suboptimal outcomes, including issues unresolved concerning the generation-load gap in models.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Stakeholders expressed a desire for further discussion on related white papers, which ERCOT commits to addressing in future discussions.</li> </ul> <h2><a href="/sharing/?token=65da56d0-b403-4823-9775-72b9bb165869">6.15</a> - NPRR1250, RPS Mandatory Program Termination</h2> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion to recommend approval of NPRR1250 as submitted added to the combo ballot.</li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">The item 1250 was tabled in September and referred to WMS, which unanimously endorsed it as submitted.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Discussion was held about adding 1250 to the combat ballot.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Concerns were raised about the effective date of the RPS program termination, with some feeling it needs to be sooner.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">The termination date of the RPS program is defined by HB1500, not ERCOT, and set for September 1st.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Procedural steps for NPRR were discussed, with a hope for approval before September 1st.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Concerns about confidentiality provisions not being removed before the program's termination were addressed, emphasizing the importance of not exposing information before deletion of the program.</li> </ul> </ul> <h3><a href="/sharing/?token=c6b8428f-ba42-4635-b3ae-4827f41ccfac">6.15b</a> - NPRR1250, RPS Mandatory Program Termination</h3> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Discussion on NPRR1250 regarding the termination of RPS Mandatory Program.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Reference to compliance premiums will not be awarded after December 31, 2024, as stated in NPRR1218.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">NPRR1218 already includes the language regarding compliance premiums which is in force.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Clarification and confirmation that NPRR1250's language echoes NPRR1218.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Addressed concerns related to repetition of language from NPRR1218.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Explanation that NPRR1250's language modifications will be "gray boxed" until September 1, 2025.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Language about premiums expiring on December 31, 2027, is the new addition.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Consensus to proceed with NPRR1250 in a combo ballot.</li> </ul> <h2><a href="/sharing/?token=6623cb83-7e47-4f8d-8c36-7347e6f2520c">6.17</a> - NPRR1252, Pre-notice for Sharing of Some Information, Addition of Research and Innovation Partner, Clarifying Notice Requirements</h2> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion to recommend approval of NPRR1252 as amended by the 11/8/24 ERCOT comments added to the combo ballot.</li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Acknowledgment of pending cleanup next year.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Mention of ERCOT's November 8th comments regarding this item.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Discussion on integrating NPRR1252 with the November 8th comments.</li> </ul> </ul> <h2><a href="/sharing/?token=edcd59de-6d32-4668-9f0c-56e9c560db1b">6.18</a> - NPRR1253, Incorporate ESR Charging Load Information into ICCP</h2> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion to recommend approval of NPRR1253 as amended by the 10/10/24 ERCOT comments added to the combo ballot.</li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">WMSWG is still reviewing NPRR1253.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">The item was tabled last month to allow the sponsor time to file comments.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Awaiting comments from the sponsor before proceeding.</li> </ul> </ul> <h2><a href="/sharing/?token=2244803f-2f31-4ff3-ac20-0fa3553b5208">6.19</a> - NPRR1255, Introduction of Mitigation of ESRs</h2> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">General agreement from past discussions to not implement until after RTC.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">For NPRR1255, Caitlin requested to table it due to a longer implementation outlook and agreed to provide more details by the next PRS meeting.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">There is consensus to keep NPRR1255 tabled until comments are filed or comfort with ERCOT is established.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">NPRR1253 was discussed within the Wholesale Market Working Group, but its official status is unclear as it is not tabled with ROS.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">TIEC had questions on NPRR1253 but is now open to moving it forward as their questions were addressed.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">NPRR1253 needs to be in effect by June 1, with a version of language recommended for approval.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Discussion on NPRR1253 included the October 10th ERCOT comments related to Patterson and Company's proposal, aiming to clean up references to prices and data.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Further cost analysis for NPRR1253 to be done as indicated by Mr. Whitmire.</li> </ul> <h1><a href="/sharing/?token=8bd5ef64-cb7f-41d1-b8f3-906351f9ae34">7</a> - Review of Revision Request Language - Vote - Diana Coleman</h1> <h2><a href="/sharing/?token=cfe74a64-db5e-4769-9bf5-74fa21464826">7.1</a> - NPRR1256, Settlement of MRA of ESRs</h2> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion to table NPRR1256 and refer the issue to WMS added to the combo ballot.</li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Introduction of NPRR1256, concerning settlement MRA for energy storage resources.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">This item is being introduced by ERCOT and it is the first time it is being discussed at PRS.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">No representative from ERCOT present to speak on the proposal.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Consideration to table and refer the item for further review.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Suggestion for PRS and WMS to examine and verify the proposal.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">The item relates to protocol language updates needed for energy storage resources.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Current protocols use generation resource language which needs adaptation for the integration of energy storage resources as a single model.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Potential updates to MRA language to reference generation resources or energy storage resources.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Mathematical validations required, possibly by WMS.</li> </ul> </ul> <h2><a href="/sharing/?token=78a6712c-d888-4750-85bb-de280166eed2">7.2</a> - NPRR1257, Limit on Amount of RRS a Resource can Provide Using Primary Frequency Response</h2> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion to table NPRR1257 and refer the issue to ROS added to the combo ballot.</li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">This proposal originated from recommendations by a consultant, GE, to address the risk of common mode failure, which could lead to NERC requirements violations.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">A static limit derived from studies conducted by ERCOT is proposed, with a recommended limit of 157 megawatts per resource.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">The limit applies per resource and not per station, with each resource expected to have independent controls to mitigate risks from common mode failures.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">There are companion NOGRR documents providing detailed application instructions for the proposed limit.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Some concerns were raised on regulatory certainty and changeability of the limit number, but these were addressed collaboratively with ERCOT.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Questions were raised regarding the application of the limit: 20% of HSL or 157 megawatts for thermal resources, and verified droop performance for batteries.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Recommendation to table this NPRR for further discussion and consideration by the ROS and PDCWG.</li> </ul> </ul> <h2><a href="/sharing/?token=d4b835fe-7f17-4fef-a81b-6b2d9e010bdf">7.3</a> - NPRR1258, TSP Performance Monitoring Update</h2> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion to recommend approval of NPRR1258 as submitted added to the combo ballot.</li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Removal of duplicative language in section 8.3 and section 3.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Clarification on requirements for submissions to ERCOT via the common information model to follow a defined naming convention.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">The submission system automatically rejects non-compliant naming conventions, reducing the need for additional performance monitoring.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Monitoring program viewed as redundant and potentially pose compliance risks.</li> </ul> </ul> <h2><a href="/sharing/?token=2bb5dc71-7793-40ce-9dde-4039f08456b9">7.4</a> - NPRR1259, Update Section 15 Level Response Language</h2> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion to table NPRR1259 and refer the issue to RMS added to the combo ballot.</li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Clarification that retail transaction response timing requirements are not included for planned and approved retail system outages.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Consideration to table and refer the item to RMS for further review.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Discussion on the need for additional clarification on approval by the TAC Subcommittee regarding ERCOT planned outages.</li> </ul> </ul> <h1><a href="/sharing/?token=5b099930-9d31-4aba-9e50-37dc92ef8dcb">8</a> - Other Business - Diana Coleman</h1> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Discussed possibility of not having PRS meeting in December as there will not be a December TAC meeting</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">January PRS meeting is scheduled prior to the TAC meeting.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">NPRR1151 allows cancellation of monthly PRS meetings.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Concern raised about skipping the December meeting as new NPRRs are available for discussion.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">If December meeting is skipped, certain NPRRs would be delayed to future meetings.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Productivity noted with end-of-year NPRRs and filing deadlines approaching.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Suggestion to consider using Webex or alternate options for December meeting if needed.</li> </ul> <h1><a href="/sharing/?token=32cae332-955e-4bf2-8006-f4796f463dc8">9</a> - Combo Ballot - Vote - Diana Coleman</h1> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion to approve combo ballot carries unanimously </li> </ul> <img src="/storage/docs/2024/11/20241114%20PRS%20Combo%20Details.png" width="865" height="191" /> <img src="/storage/docs/2024/11/20241114%20PRS%20Combo.png" width="865" height="749" /> <h1><a href="/sharing/?token=823cbbeb-b1ce-49d6-ac00-0940a34f27ef">10</a> - Adjourn - Diana Coleman</h1>