<div class="news-image-container"><img src="/storage/docs/2025/02/01-30-2025-WMWG-Hero.png" /></div>
<h3><a href="/sharing/?token=df8b3533-010b-4fda-8c2a-7619bf779a5e"><span style="font-weight: 400;">▶️</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">1 - Antitrust Admonition - Amanda Frazier</span></h3>
<h3><a href="/sharing/?token=875f5931-d5be-425a-b355-950489fbb771"><span style="font-weight: 400;">▶️</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">2 - Questions on Standing Reports - WMWG Participants</span></h3>
<p><a href="/storage/docs/2025/01/Monthly%20RUC%20Market%20Impacts.pdf"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Monthly RUC Market Impacts</span></a></p>
<p><a href="/storage/docs/2025/01/Market%20Update.pdf"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Market Update</span></a></p>
<p><a href="/storage/docs/2025/01/Wind%20Forecast%20Monthly.pdf"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Wind Forecast Monthly</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> </span></p>
<p><a href="/storage/docs/2025/01/Solar%20Forecast%20Monthly_3fg885c15ib7.pdf"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Solar Forecast Monthly</span></a></p>
<p><a href="/storage/docs/2025/01/Intra-Hour%20IRR%20Forecast%20Accuracy.pdf"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Intra-Hour IRR Forecast Accuracy</span></a></p>
<p><a href="/storage/docs/2025/01/GREDP%20Summary.pdf"><span style="font-weight: 400;">GREDP Summary</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> </span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Discussion on the posted reports for the Working Methods Working Group (WMWG).</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">A schedule is in place for WMWG meetings this year, causing ERCOT's reports to be about a month behind.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Current meeting is reviewing December reports; next meeting will review January reports.</span></li>
</ul>
<h3><a href="/sharing/?token=93b7e6bf-625f-4f6e-961f-8658825ea947"><span style="font-weight: 400;">▶️</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">3 - Federal EPA Impacts on ERCOT Generation - Susan Hildebrand</span></h3>
<p><a href="/storage/docs/2025/01/Vistra%20Federal%20EPA%20Impacts%20on%20ERCOT%20Generation.pdf"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Vistra Federal EPA Impacts on ERCOT Generation</span></a></p>
<p> </p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Susan Hildebrand discussed the state of federal EPA rules on the ERCOT market under the new administration.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Focus areas included personnel, executive orders, and implications on ERCOT.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Personnel changes include the confirmation of Lee Zeldin as the EPA administrator and experiences of other key administrators noted for air, waste, and water.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Important executive orders highlighted involve environmental issues including policies like "unleashing American energy" and removing the US from the Paris Climate Agreement.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Discussion on the social cost of carbon and implications of calculating domestic vs global impact.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">EPA's consideration to revisit the "endangerment finding", which underpins greenhouse gas regulation.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Litigation challenges surrounding various regulations including carbon pollution standards, cross state air pollution rule, mercury air toxic standards, etc.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Potential impacts on ERCOT’s long-term system assessment due to changes in environmental assumptions.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Coal plant retirement dates discussed in light of coal ash residual rules.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Implications of new construction or continued operation of plants affected by executive orders or changes in regulations.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Discussion on litigation options for the administration to potentially remand current regulations back to agencies.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">No imminent changes expected to PTCs and ITCs; current frameworks remain unchanged.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Overall implications include potential easing of burdens for new plant constructions but economic viability of new coal plants remains questionable.</span></li>
</ul>
<h3><a href="/sharing/?token=9477ff7b-1722-4534-b7ce-9f75d916f59e"><span style="font-weight: 400;">▶️</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">4 - NPRR1256, Settlement for MRA of ESRs – Capacity Verification Refinements - ERCOT</span></h3>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Concerns raised in the previous meeting about ERCOT's capacity validation for ESRs were addressed.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Introduction of a reduction factor for standby payments based on the state of charge at the beginning of a block.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Standby payments will be reduced proportionally if the ESR state of charge is not at a sufficient level.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Full state of charge results in no reduction in standby payments.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Adjustments to NPRR language based on previous feedback were appreciated.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Recommendation made for the proposal to move to WMS for a vote.</span></li>
</ul>
<h3><a href="/sharing/?token=287c64eb-6047-4b10-bcd0-34b6155b0eff"><span style="font-weight: 400;">▶️</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">5 - NPRR1190, HDLO Provision for Increased LSE Costs – Global Limit Concept - Bill Barnes</span></h3>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bill Barnes supports the concept of a settlement cost trigger due to consumer expectations of HDLO override rarity and costs. He plans to file this concept for stakeholder consideration.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">There's consideration to extend the same concept to NPRR1229, with stakeholders expressing mixed readiness for such an extension.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Discussion on the history and impact of events in NPRR1229, including repair cost components and a need for more detailed historical data.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Clarifications on NPRR1229 discussed, highlighting the CMP and VDI mechanics and potential language adjustments.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Magie Shanks from ERCOT added comments about settlement procedures and clarification on the implementation process.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The approach moving forward involves another round of discussion in the next meeting to address unresolved questions and ensure alignment before presenting to WMS.</span></li>
</ul>
<h3><a href="/sharing/?token=d4eb4799-746f-4d95-ac1f-c16eeba7e50a"><span style="font-weight: 400;">▶️</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">6 - NPRR1229, Real-Time CMP Cost Recovery Payment – Discussion about Inclusion in NPRR1190-Related Global Limit - Eric Goff/Lucas Turner</span></h3>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Concerns remain about the expanded concepts in NPRR1190 and NPRR1229, and uncertainty if the compromise resolves these issues.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Eric Goff mentioned the possibility of discontinuing opposition to the NPRRs but noted that consumer concerns may still remain unaddressed.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bill Barnes proposed a compromise with a $10,000,000 marker for out-of-market payments, requiring ERCOT to report to TAC with reasons and reduction recommendations.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">NPRR1229 addresses payments to generators forced offline due to a CMP process exposing them to an N-0 contingency.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Discussion about whether NPRR1229 should be included in the overall NPRR1190 compromise.</span></li>
</ul>
<h3><a href="/sharing/?token=5c16d604-6ff7-4e3e-a230-6a92f7b8b185"><span style="font-weight: 400;">▶️</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">7 - CARD/CRRBA – Presentation of Requested Data - Austin Rosel</span></h3>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The analysis was not completed in time for the meeting, but they were close to finishing it.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">There were additional data requests and a longer time frame requested previously.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The analysis will cover 7 years due to data retention limitations, not the initially requested 10 years.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Austin Rosel aimed to post the analysis 1-2 weeks in advance of the next meeting for review.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Katie Rich from Vistra announced plans to file their own presentation, aligning with ERCOT's scheduling.</span></li>
</ul>
<h3><a href="/sharing/?token=1f391bd5-6f98-4339-a9bd-6aa2104baef7"><span style="font-weight: 400;">▶️</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">8 - Other Business - WMWG Participants</span></h3>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">No additional topics were added under other business.</span></li>
</ul>
<h3><a href="/sharing/?token=914a181f-4684-4b64-a22c-da332b9b60af"><span style="font-weight: 400;">▶️</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">9 - Adjourn - Amanda Frazier</span></h3>
<p><br /><br /><br /></p>