Frame

Meeting Summary - 11/07/24 ROS Meeting

Grid Monitor AI
11/08/2024

<h2><img src="/storage/docs/2024/11/11072024ROSHero.png" width="865" height="650" /></h2> <h2><a href="/sharing/?token=441c322d-8db5-4ab7-8371-9449bde8ee67">0</a> - Validation for ROS Standing Representatives - ERCOT Staff</h2> <h2><a href="/sharing/?token=7d0efb6c-9e4d-4401-91bf-f285f60fc5cf">1</a> - Antitrust Admonition - Katie Rich</h2> <h2><a href="/sharing/?token=9e5ad5a2-f20e-4766-80ab-8f70f2aea48b">2</a> - Agenda Review - Katie Rich</h2> <h2><a href="/sharing/?token=4d304785-b625-4fa3-ac78-ffc0373cd1c7">3</a> - Approval of ROS Meeting Minutes - Possible Vote - Katie Rich</h2> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion to approve October 3rd, 2024 ROS meeting minutes added to Combo Ballot</li> </ul> <h2><a href="/sharing/?token=bcef0ef2-bfb2-42a3-8aad-1c2bbf138829">4</a> - Technical Advisory Committee TAC Update - Katie Rich</h2> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Extensive discussion on NPRR1190 about HDL overrides; sent back from the board to TAC and tabled for more discussion next month.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Lengthy discussion on NPRR1180.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">PGRR107 is on the agenda for today but tabled for next month along with discussion on NPRR1180.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">All revision requests brought to TAC were tabled, awaiting NPRRs at PRS.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Follow-up on NOGRR245, with the Commission to conduct a rulemaking for subsequent issues.</li> </ul> <h2><a href="/sharing/?token=2a943bc6-5bbd-4977-910a-c1e3ac908c46">5</a> - ERCOT Reports</h2> <h3><a href="/sharing/?token=d0934c5a-5651-4dca-a1eb-f62149bb797b">5.1</a> - Operations Report - Alex Lee</h3> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Unofficial October peak demand was 77,780 MW, which is 6,690 MW less compared to September of the previous year.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">A record for solar generation was set at 21,667 MW on September 8.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">One frequency event was mentioned, linked to a unit trip, but no ECRS or RRS deployments were needed.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">One DC tie curtailment occurred.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">There were 26 HRUC commitments, with nine due to congestion and 17 due to system capacity.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">ERCOT issued an OCN and an advisory for a potential tropical cyclone on September 9.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Geomagnetic disturbance advisories of [K-7] or higher were issued.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Frequency control issues began at the end of October, starting around October 27, causing reg exhaustion and additional operator actions.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Incorrect HSL telemetry for many IRR resources at ERCOT affected SCED dispatch.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Multiple RFIs were sent to correct the telemetry issues, to improve dispatch and enhance frequency control.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">A call for corrective actions and a quick turnaround on telemetry issues was made, with a week's deadline for responsive actions.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Follow-up discussion is anticipated at the December meeting if telemetry corrections are completed on time.</li> </ul> <h3><a href="/sharing/?token=fb2f109d-9a70-4fce-937f-fbcf003918d9">5.2</a> - System Planning Report - Ping Yan</h3> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Ping Yin presented the monthly system planning report for ERCOT Grid Planning.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">An update on the extra High Voltage Infrastructure plan will be discussed at the upcoming RPG meeting next Tuesday.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Ping Yin expressed willingness to address any questions, though none were raised during this segment.</li> </ul> <h3><a href="/sharing/?token=78abe145-bcc6-43b8-9e17-49ae09292361">5.3</a> - DWG Procedure Manual - Vote - Erin Wasik-Gutierrez</h3> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion to approve the DWG Procedure as submitted added to combo ballot</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Erin Wasik-Gutierrez introduced changes to the DWG manual for approval.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Previous changes related to NOGRR245 had inadvertently omitted existing language.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">The current proposal involves reinstating omitted text that was existing language.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">The reinstated text is visible in sections 3.4.1 through 4 of the manual.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">The request for approval is for transparency, ensuring all members had visibility into the changes.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Suggestion to place the item on the combo ballot for voting.</li> </ul> <h2><a href="/sharing/?token=c4573090-ff7b-46c3-b1ac-2dea81850983">6</a> - ROS Revision Requests - Vote - Katie Rich</h2> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Three IAs,, all have no impact.</li> </ul> <h3><a href="/sharing/?token=68d26c22-8d7e-4074-a7fb-3ec76d4b03fb">6.1</a> - PGRR107, Related to NPRR1180, Inclusion of Forecasted Load in Planning Analyses</h3> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion to endorse and forward to TAC the 10/3/24 ROS Report and 10/16/24 Impact Analysis for PGRR107</li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">There was a delay in releasing the IA because of ERCOT's review of NPRR1180.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">The review of NPRR1180’s IA led to revisions, but PGRR107's IA remains unchanged.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">No project required.</li> </ul> </ul> <h3><a href="/sharing/?token=0a0b8ae3-ae03-487e-93c5-e79aed936f52">6.2</a> - PGRR118, Related to NPRR1246, Energy Storage Resource Terminology Alignment for the Single-Model Era</h3> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion to endorse and forward to TAC the 10/3/24 ROS Report and 7/31/24 Impact Analysis for PGRR118.</li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">No project required.</li> </ul> </ul> <h3><a href="/sharing/?token=07800919-2438-4d1d-9bfc-78c4cf2f1bf8">6.3</a> - NOGRR268, Related to NPRR1246, Energy Storage Resource Terminology Alignment for the Single-Model Era</h3> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion to endorse and forward to TAC the 10/3/24 ROS Report and 7/31/24 Impact Analysis for NOGRR268.</li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">No project required.</li> </ul> </ul> <h3><a href="/sharing/?token=a06d3a44-531a-48e8-a73f-cb3ca94ad55a">6.4</a> - PGRR120, SSO Prevention for Generator Interconnection</h3> <a href="https://ercot-control-docs.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/31/06-november_ros_sso_prevention_pgrr120.pdf">06-november_ros_sso_prevention_pgrr120</a> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion to table PGRR120 and refer the issue to PLWG and DWG added to combo ballot</li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Background information was provided on the series capacitors in the ERCOT system, initially installed to facilitate renewable energy transfer and other generation transfers.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Defined various types of subsynchronous oscillations  including SSR, SSCI, and SSFR, and discussed SSR mitigation strategies present in ERCOT protocols.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Highlighted historical SSO events and the continued occurrence of SSR events, despite existing mitigation measures, causing delays and equipment issues.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">The proposal of PGRR120 aims to prevent new generation projects from interconnecting such that they are N-1 (one Credible Single Contingency) from being radial to a series capacitor(s) and includes measures for generator modifications and real-time SSO mitigation.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Clarified that the mitigation requirements primarily apply to new transmission-connected generators and addressed informal comments regarding distributed generation.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Cyrus Reed raised questions about the distribution of mitigation responsibilities between generators and TDUs, discovering that the generator community carries most of the financial responsibility for SSR mitigation.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">It was revealed that fully mitigating SSR issues is complex and challenging, leading to the proposal to prevent new generators from connecting in high-risk configurations.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">There was a suggestion to analyze and determine the impact on generators currently in the queue and understand how many projects might be affected by the proposed PGRR120.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Questions were raised by other participants on the SSO event list, the number of affected projects, and the handling of series capacitors.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Clarified that ERCOT requested PGRR120 be tabled and referred to PLWG and DWG, reflecting the complexity and need for further analysis.</li> </ul> </ul> <h3><a href="/sharing/?token=39d1d137-35c8-4aaa-a17d-4194d63a5f3f">6.5</a> - NOGRR271, Related to NPRR1257, Limit on Amount of RRS a Resource can Provide Using Primary Frequency Response</h3> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion to table NOGRR271 and refer the issue to PDCWG added to combo ballot</li> </ul> <h2><a href="/sharing/?token=20d484e5-881b-465e-950f-d5a0d418cdc8">7</a> - NPRR1257, Limit on Amount of RRS a Resource can Provide Using Primary Frequency Response - Possible Vote - Katie Rich</h2> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion to request PRS to table NPRR1257 for further review by PDCWG added to combo ballot</li> </ul> <h2><a href="/sharing/?token=5394d49a-af83-4dfb-914c-2065b96ebdeb">8</a> - Revision Requests Tabled at PRS and Referred to ROS - Possible Vote - Katie Rich.</h2> <h3><a href="/sharing/?token=19a90666-acd4-40bf-9a68-cc94f255d1d6">8.1</a> - NPRR1229, Real-Time Constraint Management Plan Energy Payment</h3> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">NPRR1229 is currently being reviewed by WMWG.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">No updates or discussions were conducted during this meeting on this agenda item.</li> </ul> <h3><a href="/sharing/?token=a74399ea-d4b7-481b-bed0-8da28279fc6a">8.2</a> - NPRR1234, Interconnection Requirements for Large Loads and Modeling Standards for Loads 25 MW or Greater - NDSWG</h3> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">NPRR1234 is under review by the NDSWG.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">A presentation on NPRR1234 is expected to be given today.</li> </ul> <h2><a href="/sharing/?token=1f17f429-ac49-4acf-ae1c-e7c375eb4c96">9</a> - Revision Requests Tabled at ROS - Possible Vote - Katie Rich</h2> 9.1 - PGRR073, Related to NPRR956, Designation of Providers of Transmission Additions <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">PGRR073 will remain in its current status.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">The meeting will proceed with OWG's presentation followed by a break.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Eithar Nashawati from Oncor inquired about NPRR1229 and its expectation from ROS.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">The NPRR229 remains tabled to address questions from ERCOT to STEC, which are technical and market-related.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">The need for input from ROS is a reason for the item staying tabled.</li> </ul> <h2><a href="/sharing/?token=4836745e-3403-440a-a28a-66dd3c6272e1">10</a> - Operations Working Group - OWG - Rickey Floyd</h2> <a href="/storage/docs/2024/11/10-owg_ros_20241107.pdf">10-owg_ros_20241107.pdf</a> <h3><a href="/sharing/?token=e0c68338-f097-4ad0-aa77-7c7141db75a9">10.1</a> - NPRR1070, Planning Criteria for GTC Exit Solutions - OWG, PLWG - Possible Vote</h3> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">NPRR1070 planning criteria for GTC exit solution is currently tabled at OWG.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Awaiting follow-up comments from ERCOT regarding their approach to the planning criteria.</li> </ul> <h3><a href="/sharing/?token=6ce6a257-4a75-4721-a93a-d2128d0d17c6">10.2</a> - NPRR1238, Voluntary Registration of Loads with Curtailable Load Capabilities - OWG - Possible Vote</h3> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Waiting for ERCOT comments to be posted for NPRR1238.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">OWG will review the comments to try to reach consensus.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Concerns about tracking Voluntary Early Curtailment Loads (VECLs).</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">No recent update from ERCOT on the comments.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Hopeful for comments to be filed before the next OWG meeting.</li> </ul> <h3><a href="/sharing/?token=6ffbc752-6aa7-48be-a34d-d67e23c5d010">10.3</a> - NOGRR265, Related to NPRR1238, Voluntary Registration of Loads with Curtailable Load Capabilities - OWG - Possible Vote</h3> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">The agenda item relates to NPRR1238, and ERCOT comments are pending.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">ERCOT had hoped to file comments before the current meeting but received further input from their Legal department suggesting a different approach.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">ERCOT is having additional internal discussions and aims to submit comments before the next OWG meeting.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Attendees are reminded to inform Ricky or Tyler if comments are delayed.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Imani has questions that are best addressed at the next OWG meeting, where Agee and possibly Bill Blevins will be available.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">The current meeting has concluded with a 10-minute break scheduled before resuming with the PLWG update.</li> </ul> <h2><a href="/sharing/?token=d9985411-ae69-4d7e-b154-69a0b84c97a5">11</a> - Planning Working Group - PLWG - Dylan Preas</h2> <a href="/storage/docs/2024/11/11-planning-working-group-report_10162024.pdf">11-planning-working-group-report_10162024.pdf</a> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Discussion focused on the PLWG report.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Dylan Preas and Mina Turner outlined the agenda for NPRR1247.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Initial updates were provided before addressing specific slides on NPRR1247.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Dylan Preas introduced himself as the PLWG Chair.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">The Planning Working Group meeting took place on October 16th.</li> </ul> <h3><a href="/sharing/?token=04240bbf-ac22-411b-aa70-06876339f0ac">11.1</a> - PGRR115, Related to NPRR1234, Interconnection Requirements for Large Loads and Modeling Standards for Loads 25 MW or Greater - PLWG - Possible Vote</h3> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">PGRR115 interconnection requirements for large loads were reviewed.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Focus on modeling standards for loads 25 MWor greater.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Reviewed comments from AEP on larger load rules and processes.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Included discussion of new terms and applicable thresholds for large generator interconnection studies.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Consideration of loads requested in neighboring TSPs within the same area.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">ERCOT plans to submit reply comments before the November 12th PLWG meeting.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">The item was tabled for further discussion.</li> </ul> <h3><a href="/sharing/?token=99835826-6555-4d24-b658-55b8f3b417ce">11.2</a> - PGRR117, Addition of Resiliency Assessment and Criteria to Reflect PUCT Rule Changes - PLWG - Possible Vote</h3> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion to recommend approval of PGRR117 as amended by the 10/11/24 ERCOT comments added to combo ballot</li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">PGRR117 is being passed on to ROS for consideration.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">The addition of resiliency assessment and criteria is introduced in Section 3 (regional planning) and Section 4 (transmission system criteria) of the Planning guide.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">ERCOT’s 10/11/24 comments were reviewed.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">There's a concern about the lack of a clear process on using the results from the resiliency assessment.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">ERCOT plans to propose an NPRR to address how to evaluate upgrades meeting the proposed resiliency criteria.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">The recommendation to move forward to ROS is based on ERCOT’s comments.</li> </ul> </ul> <h3><a href="/sharing/?token=b0c2d2b0-04fd-4f8d-a782-64d1ff916f7f">11.3</a> - PGRR119, Stability Constraint Modeling Assumptions in the Regional Transmission Plan</h3> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Introduction of PGRR119 regarding stability constraint modeling assumptions in the Regional Transmission Plan (RTP).</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">First presentation of this item to PLWG.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Review by ERCOT which formalizes the current practice of applying a reliability margin to stability constraints.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Modeling of constraints takes place in RTP reliability and economic base cases.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Request made to table the item for further discussion after an initial review.</li> </ul> <h3><a href="/sharing/?token=507f1745-75ac-4598-9f22-2343ca5602d7">11.4</a> - NPRR1247, Incorporation of Congestion Cost Savings Test in Economic Evaluation of Transmission Projects - PLWG - Possible Vote</h3> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion to endorse NPRR1247 as amended by the 10/23/24 ERCOT comments</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion carries with 76.9% in favor, and 11 abstentions.</li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">NPRR1247 was initially skipped and then reintroduced for discussion.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Discussion included NERC CIP-014-4 revisions and its ballot failure.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">NERC TPL-008-1 on transmission planning for extreme weather was mentioned.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Review of load planning language from PGRR107 will be revisited in October or November.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Discussion about moving forward with PGRR117; added to the combo ballot.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Dylan presented NPRR1247's purpose and outcome of the special October 29th meeting.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">PLWG draft with luminant comments was highlighted featuring three main language changes.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">ERCOT's comments post-PLWG meeting were discussed, noting oppositions to incorporating certain white papers.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Option to consider and vote on ERCOT or PLWG versions of the NPRR based on white papers impact.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Concerns over voting urgency and procedural constraints were expressed.</li> </ul> </ul> <h2><a href="/sharing/?token=8b322f70-098e-47ff-ab38-4c60bcccb4b4">12</a> - Network Data Support Working Group - NDSWG - Gerardo Escamilla</h2> <a href="/storage/docs/2024/11/12-ndswg_report_to_ros_10312024.pdf">12-ndswg_report_to_ros_10312024.pdf</a> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Discussion on the ICCP handbook and NPRR1234 modeling for loads of 25 MW or greater.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Clarification on identifying loads as large customers, commercial, or residential.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Consideration of identifying if a station has single or multiple load owners.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Pending discussion and decision on the ICCP handbook linked with RTC+B Project.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Reiteration of the urgency for the NPRR1247 IA at PRS to meet the end-of-year timeline.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Confirmation that either NPRR1247 version wouldn't require changes to the IA.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Acknowledgment that no changes to IA would ensure keeping the urgent timeline.</li> </ul> <h2><a href="/sharing/?token=93568c9c-4c1f-4055-9685-24298697bfcc">13</a> - Combo Ballot - Vote - Katie Rich</h2> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion to approve the combo ballot as presented passes with 100% in favor with no abstentions.</li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Motion to approve October 3, 2024 ROS Meeting Minutes.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Motion to approve the DWG Procedure Manual as submitted.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">PGRR107 - Motion to endorse and forward to TAC the 10/3/24 ROS Report and 10/16/24 Impact Analysis.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">PGRR118 - Motion to endorse and forward to TAC the 10/3/24 ROS Report and 7/31/24 Impact Analysis .</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">NOGRR268 - Motion to endorse and forward to TAC the 10/3/24 ROS Report and 7/31/24 Impact Analysis.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Motion to table PGRR120 and refer the issue to PLWG and DWG</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Motion to table NOGRR271 and refer the issue to PDCWG</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Motion to request PRS to table NPRR1257 for further review by PDCWG</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Motion to recommend approval of PGRR117 as amended by the 10/11/24 ERCOT comments</li> </ul> </ul> <h2>14 - Dynamics Working Group (DWG)</h2> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Not Discussed</li> </ul> <h2>15 - Inverter Based Resources Working Group (IBRWG)</h2> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Not Discussed</li> </ul> <h2>16 - Steady State Working Group (SSWG) </h2> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Not Discussed</li> </ul> <h2>17 - Operations Training Working Group (OTWG)</h2> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Not Discussed</li> </ul> <h2><a href="/sharing/?token=ae800093-e8eb-4834-bd6d-4e2c8383256b">18</a> - Other Business - Katie Rich</h2> <h3><a href="/sharing/?token=72e63c2a-16cb-4638-9fbf-6e6177679d77">18.1</a> - Review Open Action Items List</h3> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Discussion on NOGRR245 and upcoming related work.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">EEA 2 event on September 6th, 2023 reviewed by working groups. No lingering issues reported.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">No immediate actions required on parking lot items.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Next meeting scheduled for December 5th..</li> </ul> <h3>18.2.1 - Black Start Working Group (BSWG)</h3> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Not Discussed</li> </ul> <h3>18.2.2 - PDCWG</h3> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Not Discussed</li> </ul> <h3><a href="/sharing/?token=f24a6e84-f8a6-47a3-b7b7-8f8c10d54325">18.2.4</a> - System Protection Working Group - SPWG</h3> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">SPWG conducted a survey with TDSPs regarding the system protection topic.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">The item will be brought up again in the November Agenda.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Next steps include deciding on the need for a subsequent PGRR or any binding document drafts.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Topic is still actively being worked on.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Update received on the ICCP handbook from NDSWG.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Awaiting feedback from ERCOT for further review.</li> </ul> 18.2.5 - Not Discussed <h2><a href="/sharing/?token=8ad86690-c46d-4a95-aa95-0caba34a5d21">19</a> - Adjourn </h2>