<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">3 - Meeting Minutes - Katie Rich</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">3.1 - May 2 - Katie Rich</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">May 2, 2024 ROS Meeting Minutes - To approve the May 2, 2024 ROS meeting minutes as submitted</li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion carries on combo ballot.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><a href="/sharing/?token=66108940-4dca-4431-8556-bab12975958b" target="_blank" rel="noopener">4</a> - TAC Update - Katie Rich</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Discussion tomorrow morning will have to result in a vote on the language, going to the board on the 17th and 18th</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">ROS: NPRR1198 and associated PGRR and NOGRR were adopted</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">5 - ERCOT Reports - Alex Lee</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><a href="/sharing/?token=7801515a-61c3-4a9c-9085-4e751525e95c" target="_blank" rel="noopener">5.1</a> - Operations Report - Alex Lee</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Peak demand for April was just shy of 64GW</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Three frequency events occurred due to generator unit trips</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">ECRS deployed twice, both due to net load capability, not unit trips</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">No instances of RRS deployment</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">North Vandenberg had the most congestions, 27 days</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Request to add generation remaining capacity for South Texas IROL for next month's report</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><a href="/sharing/?token=24020335-d497-44b7-869e-6d14c92923d4" target="_blank" rel="noopener">5.2</a> - System Planning Report - Ping Yan</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Robert Golan (ERCOT) presented the System Planning Report in place of Ping Yan.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Updated values for transmission improvements were reviewed and endorsed.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">ERCOT continues to work on the permian basin reliability plan.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Questions were raised about the status of generation hubs, and about breaking down the 50GW of new load by weather zones, both to be addressed by Ping and her group in developing the RTP cases.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Timeline for posting RTP cases is not finalized, but it is expected before starting the analysis.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The RPG meeting is scheduled for next Tuesday for those interested in these topics.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><a href="/sharing/?token=717a1d6a-3ab2-488c-b0f0-b72d8e1a914c" target="_blank" rel="noopener">5.3</a> - GTC Update - Yunzhi Cheng</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">2024 Q2 QSA identified the stability constraints due to a new generation resource connected to 138-kV grid at Kinney and Uvalde county.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">A follow-up GTC study confirmed the need to establish the Uvalde GTC to address the stability constraints under some specific N-1-1 conditions</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">This GTC is not IROL</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The GTC became effective 06/05/24. The GTC interface and associated GTLs are available in the posted GTC Methodology.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">6 - Revision Request - Katie Rich</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><a href="/sharing/?token=600a81dd-175a-410e-bb80-4dce5708a4ae" target="_blank" rel="noopener">6.1</a> - NPRR1217 - Katie Rich</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Blake Holt (LCRA) gave an update on NPRR1217 at the TWG meeting on May 2.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Discussed concerns with ERCOT and feel well positioned to respond to the XML instructions, but think an ICCP approach might be more efficient.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">LCRA was the only entity with concerns at the TWG meetings and believes NPRR1217 doesn't need to be tabled anymore.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Mark Patterson, manager of demand integration, clarified that XML is required for QSE providing ERS and representing load resources.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Control room doesn't have an alternate recommendation for redundancy</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Motion to endorse NPRR1217 as submitted carries unamiously on combo ballot.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">7 - ROS Revision - Katie Rich</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><a href="/sharing/?token=1d6695f6-3540-4ad0-9dff-e1204920045f" target="_blank" rel="noopener">7.2</a> - PGRR106 - Katie Rich</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">No project required</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">PGRR106 - To endorse and forward to TAC the 5/2/24 ROS Report and the 4/19/23 Impact Analysis for PGRR106</li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion passes unamiously.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><a href="/sharing/?token=e6b8661a-bdaf-4888-a1b7-e9048a6f8244" target="_blank" rel="noopener">9</a> - OWG - Rickey Floyd</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Peak for April was 63,997 MW on April 30, HE 1800 April 2023 Peak 60,995</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">All-time renewable peak for April was 60,995 on April 5</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">April All Time Renewable - 37,806 MW on 04/05</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">New all-time wind penetration of 69.15% on April 10</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Texas RE provided an update, including a summer outlook meeting, Texas IBR registration, and scheduled reliability workshops</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">NERC alerts from April on the 6GHz interference were acknowledged by 99% of participants in Texas</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><a href="/sharing/?token=0f993d10-ce1b-407e-89a6-af4a986b1ef3" target="_blank" rel="noopener">9.1</a> - NPRR1070 - Rickey Floyd</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">ERCOT provided an update on NPRR1070, mentioning they are still actively working on comments and coordinating with the PUC.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The issue remains tabled with OWG.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">No update was received from OTWG at the last meeting</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><a href="/sharing/?token=1998d246-d879-4ef6-a264-9bd33e5a943f" target="_blank" rel="noopener">9.2</a> - NPRR1221 - Rickey Floyd</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">No new comments filed for NPRR1221, language likely to stay as it is</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Waiting for consensus before passing back to ROS.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><a href="/sharing/?token=41095541-1f6d-4652-b3f5-c8224a7d7607" target="_blank" rel="noopener">9.3</a> - NOGRR262 - Rickey Floyd</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">OWG reviewed the 05/13/24 Oncor comments on NOGRR262</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Major changes including, but not limited to, the removal of proposed language stating that “transmission operators should avoid the use of load designated as critical under frequency load shed or under voltage load shed” since that is covered in section 4.5.3.4.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Golden Spread expressed concerns over SCADA controlled load shed and non-SCADA controlled load shed, with the need to discuss language proposals</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">ERCOT emphasized the need to gain consensus to move the issue forward, with plans to discuss new comments from Golden Spread at the next OWG meeting</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The issue remains tabled at this point in time</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><a href="/sharing/?token=54ce1369-7fc8-424c-957f-69a996f09d44" target="_blank" rel="noopener">10</a> - PDCWG - Kevin Bunch</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Annual inertia presentation discussed, showing an increase in inertia despite the rise in wind and solar assets, attributed to conservative operations.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">ERCOT presented a draft NPRR and NOGRR regarding RRS limitations, proposing a reduction in the amount of RRS a single facility could provide to 157MW as opposed to the current 20% limit.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><a href="/sharing/?token=0d23fc5d-5c53-405e-b9c1-2683ef2ed1d5" target="_blank" rel="noopener">10.1</a> - NOGRR263 - Kevin Bunch</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Debate centering around removing the obligation for CLRs to provide PFR during frequency deviations.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">ERCOT and PDC were open to moving forward with the proposal with slight modifications</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The proposal suggests that any CLR capable of, or registered to provide, ancillary services would need to provide PFR. CLRs not qualifying for ancillary services would be exempt from this obligation.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Michael Jewell (Priority Power) mentioned working with ERCOT on proposed revisions.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Other items discussed included standard archive frequency control reports, drafting a SAR for NERC BAL-001 standard, and review of the NDA list for PDC.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Current IFMR is 3 times greater than the amount of minimal RFP</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The meeting concluded with discussion of the next scheduled meeting, to be rescheduled in late June or July.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><a href="/sharing/?token=0e52cd69-dd33-48c7-af2a-964bb9275935" target="_blank" rel="noopener">11</a> - Combo Ballot - Katie Rich</span></p>
<p><img src="/storage/docs/2024/06/ROS%20Motions%20for%20June%206,%202024%20Combined%20Ballot.png" width="775" height="71" /></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><img src="/storage/docs/2024/06/ROS%20June%206,%202024%20Combined%20Ballot.png" width="849" height="805" /></span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-weight: 400;">Motion carries unanimously</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><a href="/sharing/?token=248c98c7-00ba-4867-b743-fddad6b7cffc" target="_blank" rel="noopener">12</a> - SSWG - William Robertson</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">24SSWG TPIT 2 and Final Cases expected to be posted 06/07/24 or following week.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Contingency verification and planning data dictionary to be finalized and submitted within next two weeks</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">PGRR13, SSWG to draft language for procedure manual, ERCOT to have internal review, additional month given for working group review</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">July SSWG meeting to verify draft language, hoping to bring it to July ROS for approval</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Peak load for furthest year of case build is 2031, total system load for ERCOT is 141GW</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">RPG shows 162GW in 2030, including Punz load, questioning the 20GW disconnect, attributed to offline officer letter loads within SSWG cases.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><a href="/sharing/?token=b9b7b548-0619-4214-ba59-2cb526f11869" target="_blank" rel="noopener">13</a> - VPWG - Maribel Khayat</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><img src="/storage/docs/2024/06/13-vpwg_update_to_ros_may-23.png" width="553" height="310" /></span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><a href="/sharing/?token=02e9f2fd-f8d9-4604-af8a-294b6220bad7" target="_blank" rel="noopener">14</a> - OTWG - Benny Ray</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">ERCOT operator certification:</span></li>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Task force reviewed the question bank and failure rates</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Evaluating passing rates to be above 65%</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Update expected in next meeting</span></li>
</ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Blackstar training task force:</span></li>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Using Grid Geo as training simulators for seminar</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Confirmed dates from October 14 to November 21</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Will have simulations and CBTs for CE hours</span></li>
</ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Operations training seminar task force:</span></li>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Completed sessions and collecting feedback</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Planning additional topics related to QSEs for 2025</span></li>
</ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Severe weather drill task force:</span></li>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Scheduled for sometime between August 12 and September 16</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Final date expected in next meeting</span></li>
</ul>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><a href="/sharing/?token=0f3c67c1-a121-43a8-be15-86e0a2ce9bcd" target="_blank" rel="noopener">15</a> - Notice of Withdrawal - Katie Rich</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">NPRR1191 and PGRR111 withdrawn</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><a href="/sharing/?token=158d15d7-ae03-4f2f-927f-8d6fc317941e" target="_blank" rel="noopener">16</a> - Other Business - Katie Rich</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">NPRR1234 and PGRR115 submitted by ERCOT on 05/28/24</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">PGRR115 will be originated at the next PRS meeting</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">ERCOT requests PRS to refer the NPRR1234 to ROS be considered in tandem with PGRR115</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Large Flexible Load Task Force to consider and discuss the NPRR and PGRR</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Revision requests primarily address interconnection and modeling requirements for large loads</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">NPRR1234 includes a definition of sites with an aggregated peak demand of 75MW or more</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Reflects stakeholder feedback from prior revision request package</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><a href="/sharing/?token=520c1b76-19b3-4802-baff-a716fd64c651" target="_blank" rel="noopener">16.1</a> - NPRR1234 - Katie Rich</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The concept of registered curtailable loads was removed.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Ramping limitations on large loads and voltage ride through requirements were also removed.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Concerns about ramping and voltage ride through issues were highlighted, exploring mitigation measures such as procurement of additional ancillary services and system improvements.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Language in Section 16 requiring the registration of a load 25MW or greater with ERCOT has been removed and replaced with a new requirement in Section 3.10.7.2 requiring identification and classification of loads 25MW or greater in the Network Operations Model.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Large Load Interconnection Study (LLIS) process proposed to apply to all large load interconnection requests, regardless of timeline, and interactions would be between ERCOT and the interconnecting TSPs and IE/RE if applicable.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><a href="/sharing/?token=5c553199-c7b3-47e2-977a-3d79c1b9a299" target="_blank" rel="noopener">16.3</a> - 2025 Meeting Schedule - Katie Rich</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Discussion on potentially moving meetings from Thursday to Wednesday to avoid conflict with open meetings</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Consideration of how the change may affect ROS and WMS</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><a href="/sharing/?token=2bbd2e52-bdf8-4206-b147-ed2392166e1a" target="_blank" rel="noopener">16.4</a> - Review Open Action - Katie Rich</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">A review of open action items was conducted, following a suggestion from Kevin during the PDCWG report.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Agreement to remove an assigned PDCWG item was reached after consulting with the group.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The next ROS meeting is scheduled for July 7 and will be webex only due to multiple meetings that week, given the absence of a meeting during July 4.</span></li>
</ul>