Frame

Meeting Summary - 06/24/24 TAC Meeting

Grid Monitor Staff Writer
06/25/2024

1 - Antitrust Admonition 2 - Approval of TAC Meeting Minutes - Vote - Caitlin Smith 2.1 - May 22, 2024 <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">May 22 meeting minutes placed on the combo ballot.</li> </ul> 3 - Meeting Updates - Caitlin Smith <a href="/sharing/?token=6bab454f-1c46-4adf-a6bc-ff4dd2b4fe97" target="_blank" rel="noopener">3.1</a> - June 13th PUCT Open Meeting <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">PUC approved NPRR1197</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">PUC approved NPRR1205</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">PUC approved RMGRR177</li> </ul> <a href="/sharing/?token=45b12fd3-1a37-4443-82f5-01b117e04060" target="_blank" rel="noopener">3.2</a> - June 17th – 18th Board Meetings <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">The board approved all revision requests except NOGRR245, which was tabled.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">NOGRR245 will be addressed in a special board meeting scheduled for July as a bifurcated or decoupled version with the narrow issue removed.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">A new NOGRR addressing the narrow issue will go through the regular stakeholder process.</li> </ul> <a href="/sharing/?token=c1af046c-d2a2-44b7-a4f9-6d4cb40eb452" target="_blank" rel="noopener">4</a> - Review of Revision Request Summary/ERCOT Market Impact Statement/Opinions - Ann Boren/ IMM <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">ERCOT supports all revision requests presented at the TAC meeting.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">IMM has no opinion on revision requests except for 1230.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">CFSG reviewed all NPRRs and found no credit impacts.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Three revision requests are for general system and process improvements.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Three revision requests are regulatory.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">One revision request aligns with strategic plan objective one.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">One revision request aligns with strategic plan objective two.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">One revision request is an ERCOT board PUC directive.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">NPRR1216 has a financial impact of $175,000 to $250,000.</li> </ul> 5 - PRS Report - Vote - Diana Coleman <a href="/sharing/?token=8f27cd5e-56e6-407f-a049-a46fee8e6c07" target="_blank" rel="noopener">5.1</a> - NPRR1190, High Dispatch Limit Override Provision for Increased Load Serving Entity Costs <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">NPRR1190 was approved with opposition: 1 opposing vote, 2 abstentions from the consumer segment.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">No cost or project associated.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Reliant's comments in March expanded NPRR1190 provisions to other LMPs</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">PRS agreed with recommended approval with Reliant's comments in May.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Concerns voiced regarding compensation for scheduled but undelivered power under HDL limits.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">ERCOT clarified benefits, ensuring recovery of demonstrable financial costs due to HDL overrides.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Historical issues cited: similar to problems that led to ERCOT's market design shift from zonal to nodal.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Concerns about undermining market principles: should be paid for delivered power only.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Blake Holt motioned to approve NPRR1190; Bill Barnes seconded.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion to table NPRR1190 for further IMM review; motion failed 30% for, 70% against.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion to recommend approval of NPRR1190 as recommended by TAC in the 6/13 PRS report carried 79% in favor, 6 opposed, 1 abstention.</li> </ul> <a href="/sharing/?token=e185f341-92d2-4ae2-8821-f5cff48e045c" target="_blank" rel="noopener">5.2</a> - NPRR1215, Clarifications to the Day-Ahead Market - DAM - Energy-Only Offer Calculation <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">No cost or project associated with this revision.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Unanimously voted on with January 23, 2024 IA</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">NPRR1215 Added to combo ballot</li> </ul> <a href="/sharing/?token=438ccc5d-8754-4384-b54d-05214a4fa38e" target="_blank" rel="noopener">5.3</a> - NPRR1216, Implementation of Emergency Pricing Program <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">NPRR1216 unanimously endorsed in June</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">ERCOT filed comments in response to PRS discussions about terminating the emergency pricing program.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Changes discussed at PRS earlier this month; no other changes made.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">NPRR1216 recommended by PRS, with additional ERCOT comments reflecting PRS discussions.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Clarified that ECAP (Emergency Cap Adjustment Period) transitions at the start of the next operating hour for consistency.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Added equivalent language in NPRR document and corrected a grammatical error.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">NPPR1216 added to combo ballot</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Related documents OBDRR051 and VCMRR039 added to combo ballot</li> </ul> <a href="/sharing/?token=c7a5b387-0ef6-4342-ae04-f3c03853b0dc" target="_blank" rel="noopener">5.4</a> - NPRR1225, Exclusion of Lubbock Load from Securitization Charges <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">No cost associated with this project.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">PRS unanimously endorsed with April 11, 2024 IA</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">NPRR1225 added to combo ballot</li> </ul> 6 - Revision Requests Tabled at TAC - Possible Vote - Caitlin Smith <a href="/sharing/?token=fc3ecb2f-78b4-4abe-b3ba-96c6192618a0" target="_blank" rel="noopener">6.1</a> - NPRR1230, Methodology for Setting Transmission Shadow Price Caps for an IROL in SCED – URGENT <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">5/29 ERCOT comments reviewed at the special TAC meeting on May 31.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Request for analysis from stakeholders acknowledged; ERCOT is working on it, expected to be completed by the next TAC meeting.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Reduced urgency for NPRR1230 compared to prior expectations.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Initial urgency was to prepare for the summer with the expectation of IROL emergence.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Current assessment indicates less immediate need but sooner implementation is still preferred by ERCOT.</li> </ul> <a href="/sharing/?token=c995aefc-1349-47f0-bae9-457e3482c776" target="_blank" rel="noopener">6.2</a> - OBDRR046, Related to NPRR1188, Implement Nodal Dispatch and Energy Settlement for Controllable Load Resources <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">OBDRR046 can remain tabled.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">NPRR1188 is still at PRS</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Request for update on NPRR1188 received.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Dave from ERCOT provided a status update.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">ERCOT believes NPRR1188 is ready to move forward.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Ongoing discussions to clarify some language in NPRR1188.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">ERCOT aims to make progress on NPRR1188 at the next PRS meeting.</li> </ul> <a href="/sharing/?token=01be2f32-f5a3-4e0c-b839-efb89819db4a" target="_blank" rel="noopener">6.3</a> - OBDRR051, Related to NPRR1216, Implementation of Emergency Pricing Program <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">OBDRR051 is on the combo ballot.</li> </ul> <a href="/sharing/?token=c3f57e69-df7f-475c-b978-055a363d02b3" target="_blank" rel="noopener">7</a> - RMS Report - John Schatz <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">RMGRR181 and NPRR1227 updates: Administrative cleanup to align definitions and remove verbiage inconsistencies.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Mandatory Texas Set 5.0 and MarkeTrak overviews on June 25 at 9:30 at ERCOT and via WebEx.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Opportunity for ERCOT and market participants to discuss registering for mandatory flight testing and review upcoming changes.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Meeting materials and orientation session posted to the ERCOT calendar.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Registration deadlines for flight testing: New entities by July 3, 2024; existing LSEs by July 31, 2024.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Failure to complete flight testing results in loss of certification to serve customers in ERCOT.</li> </ul> Questions and Answers: <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Question: Will there be a roll call for the mandatory meeting? Answer: Yes, there will be a roll call.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Question: Request to update on sign-ups and what’s outstanding from the LSE standpoint at the next TAC meeting. Answer: Will work with Dave Michelsen's team to provide updates.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Question: Who is the mandatory meeting for? Answer: Mandatory for every LSE and every REP.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Question: Do you have REPs that haven't signed up that send transactions regularly? Answer: Yes, many REPs have not registered as the deadline is July 31. Encouraged to register as soon as possible to avoid missing the deadline.</li> </ul> Action Items: <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Work with Dave Michelsen and team to provide updates on registration statuses at the next TAC meeting.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Encourage REPs to register for flight testing early to avoid missing the deadline.</li> </ul> 8 - ROS Report - Katie Rich <a href="/sharing/?token=1c48bf51-a63d-42b1-a572-9458c8b7030b" target="_blank" rel="noopener">8.1</a> - PGRR106, Clarify Projects Included in Transmission Project Information and Tracking - TPIT - Report <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">PGRR106 is up for a vote with TAC today.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">No action needed by ROS after review at TWG.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Endorsement by ROS as submitted; will proceed back to PRS.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Progress noted, with fewer items remaining and some new referrals from PRS.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Next meeting scheduled for July 11 via WebEx.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Approval of PGRR106 recommended as in ROS report.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">PGRR106 added to combo ballot</li> </ul> <a href="/sharing/?token=2f1751ff-8848-4cc9-b583-002936ba03f7" target="_blank" rel="noopener">9</a> - WMS Report - Jim Lee <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">ERCOT issued a heads up notice on NPRR1231.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">NPRR1231 endorsed by the June PRS.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Report presented on the 2023 annual UFE.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Four voting items were approved by WMS, VCMRR039, VCMRR040, VCMRR041, and NPRR1216.</li> </ul> <a href="/sharing/?token=b65242ce-eddc-4640-992f-1df5dcbe92e1" target="_blank" rel="noopener">9.1</a> - VCMRR039, Related to NPRR1216, Implementation of Emergency Pricing Program <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">VCMRR039 made the combo ballot today.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">VCMRR040, VCMRR041, and NPRR1216 tabled and referred to the demand side working group.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Discussion about recent EPA rules and potential actions related to greenhouse gas rule and Mercury air toxics standards.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Solicitation for feedback from TAC on whether WMS should take additional action concerning new EPA rules.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Ned highlights the importance of keeping EPA regulations on WMS's radar, implying analysis could involve several working groups.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">There is a struggle to define concrete actions or tasks, emphasizing the need for feedback to determine specific steps and complete action items.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Summary of revision requests under WMS review, with NPRR1190, NPRR1216, and VCMRR039 endorsed.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Next WMS meeting is scheduled for July 10.</li> </ul> <a href="/sharing/?token=d0d5f3dd-2b88-499d-a7ca-b80304340494">10</a> Large Flexible Load Task Force Report, Bill Blevins <ul> <li>Updates on ERCOT Activity: <ul> <li>NPRR1234 and PGRR115 have been submitted to replace NPRR1191 and PGRR111 based on stakeholder feedback.</li> <li>These new documents propose a revised interconnection process for loads 75 MW or greater and new modeling requirements for loads 25 MW or greater. This aims to improve situational awareness and load forecasting in network operations.</li> <li>Some previous concepts such as voltage ride-through standards, register curtailable load, and specific ramping requirements were omitted from the new revisions.</li> </ul> </li> <li>Discussion and Process: <ul> <li>These proposals have been brought to discussions in June at both the task force meeting and the PRS meeting.</li> <li>They are now tabled and referred to ROS (Reliability and Operations Subcommittee) for further discussion.</li> <li>The aim is to continue advancing these discussions and address them again in the July task force meeting.</li> </ul> </li> <li>Future Plans: <ul> <li>The primary discussion about these documents will take place at ROS.</li> <li>Plans are in place to move these proposals forward quickly, building on the feedback received over the past nine months since the filing of NPRR1191.</li> <li>After discussions at ROS, the proposals will return to PRS and be further discussed in the coming months.</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <a href="/sharing/?token=973b99d4-410b-4e8e-8c62-ec1ea3163e8a" target="_blank" rel="noopener">11</a> - RTC+B Task Force Report Matt Mereness <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Short update, no voting items.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Brief update from June board meeting schedule.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Discussed trial sequence preview and ongoing issues.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Completed business requirements.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">In the process of planning and developing code.</li> </ul>   <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Received day ahead market code from vendor in mid-May.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Developing RUC and SCADA codes.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">External interface specifications to be published by end of week.</li> </ul>   <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">September 2024 target for ERCOT go live schedule release.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">May 2025 vendor final release for integration and market trials setup.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Detailed market trials and sequence to mitigate risks discussed.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Non-binding open loop SCED test for price formation evaluation.</li> </ul>   <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Plans for telemetry and EMS system tests.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Closed loop LFC test for frequency control validation.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Clarifying NPRR aligned with business requirements and key principles.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Discussion on vendor participation and readiness.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">July 17 task force meeting for further review of market trial plans and attestations.</li> </ul> 12 - ERCOT Reports <a href="/sharing/?token=5b13dc3f-2e97-4abb-b819-853b237dcc75" target="_blank" rel="noopener">12.1</a> - 2025 Ancillary Service Methodology Discussion Kick Off Nitika Mago / Luis Hinojosa <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Speaker: Nitika Mago / Luis Hinojosa</li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Working groups (WMSWG and PDC) to start discussions in July on 2025 Ancillary Service methodology.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Goal to present proposed methodology to ERCOT's October board and allow PUC to review before year's end.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Urged interested parties to participate in July and August meetings.</li> </ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Speaker: Bob Whitmire</li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Inquired about adjusting methodology due to large flexible loads.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Nitika agreed to discuss and plan for sharing LFLTF updates.</li> </ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Speaker: Bob Helton</li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Emphasized importance of continuous engagement with PUC staff to avoid last-minute issues.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Nitika confirmed ongoing collaboration with PUC.</li> </ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Speaker: Bill Barnes</li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Asked about incorporating stakeholder feedback in the methodology.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Nitika mentioned potential amendments if feedback received in November/December.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Clarified that DRRS implementation likely post-2026 as per current plans.</li> </ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Speaker: Eric Goff</li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Requested multiple approaches for comparison to assist in informed decision-making.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Nitika agreed on preparing similar analyses for consistency in future discussions.</li> </ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Speaker: Ned Bonskowski</li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Questioned need for a backstop or contingency plan for unexpected changes.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Nitika to discuss with PUC and update in the July meeting.</li> </ul> </ul> 13 - Other Business <a href="/sharing/?token=b07f904d-d2f4-42e7-9236-5c7aba1932c0" target="_blank" rel="noopener">13.1</a> - PUC Ancillary Services Study Update Jeff Billo / IMM <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Probabilistic modeling is being used to determine optimal ancillary services procurement quantities in ERCOT.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">The study focuses on long-term response products, without emphasis on PFR and regulation, but includes ECRS and Non-Spin, and explores DRRS as a product.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Historical data from June last year to this June is used, with 10,000 iterations for every hour in the study to model probabilities of outages.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Coordination with ERCOT and PUC is ongoing to ensure data reliability and comfort with methodologies.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">There's a need for balance between future load forecasts and the current limited time frame of the study.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Dynamic ancillary services plans are being considered, though complexities of implementation are acknowledged.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Key concerns include correlating weather variables, cumulative factors of generator trips, and accounting for headroom capacity in reserves.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Additional stakeholder feedback and involvement are crucial, particularly regarding aligning methodologies with real-time operational risks.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">A workshop is scheduled for August to further discuss the methodology and seek stakeholder input.</li> </ul> Questions & Answers: <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Question: How closely are you working with ERCOT and the PUC?</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Answer: Coordination occurs regularly and methodologies are discussed monthly, feedback is incorporated.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Question: Will future load forecasts be incorporated into the study?</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Answer: Currently not focused on future load forecasts due to the limited study timeframe.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Question: How is the Monte Carlo simulation framed?</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Answer: Using historical hours with 10,000 random iterations to model outage probabilities based on varied inputs.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Question: How do you handle the forecast error and battery storage in the study?</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Answer: Adjustments are being made for improved forecasts and different time horizons for products.</li> </ul> Additional Points: <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Stakeholder engagement and feedback are emphasized as critical to refining the study and its methodologies.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Operational risk and cost considerations need to be balanced for effective ancillary service planning.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Dynamic ancillary service plans could potentially increase efficiency but require detailed analysis and time.</li> </ul> <a href="/sharing/?token=9d28b030-ea34-41f4-b9b4-d8ee45e811d1" target="_blank" rel="noopener">14</a> - Combo Ballot - Vote - Caitlin Smith <img src="/storage/docs/2024/06/JUNE24TACBallot.png" width="884" height="110" /> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Motion initiated by Ned and seconded by Blake</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Vote conducted by Corey</li> <li>Motion carried unanimously</li> </ul>   <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Consumers unanimously approved the motion:</li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Eric Goff: Yes</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Nabara Pokharelj: Yes</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Mark Dreyfus: Yes</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Nick Ferenbach: Yes</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Garrett Kent: Yes</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Eric Schubert: Yes</li> </ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">CoOps unanimously approved the motion:</li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Mike Wise: Yes</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Blake Holt: Yes and Yes</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">John Packard: Not present</li> </ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Independent Generators unanimously approved the motion:</li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Bryan Sams: Yes</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Caitlin Smith: Yes</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Bob Helton: Yes</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Ned Bonskowski: Yes</li> </ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">IPM unanimously approved the motion:</li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Resmi Surendran: Yes</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Jeremy Carpenter: Yes</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Ian Haley: Yes</li> </ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">IREPs unanimously approved the motion:</li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Bill Barnes: Yes</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Jennifer Schmitt: Yes</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Christopher J.: Yes (twice)</li> </ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">IOUs unanimously approved the motion:</li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Keith Nix: Yes</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">David Mercado: Yes</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Colin Martin: Yes</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Richard Ross: Yes</li> </ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Munis unanimously approved the motion:</li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Russell Franklin: Not present</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Jose Gaytan: Yes</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">David Kee: Yes</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2">Alicia Loving: Yes</li> </ul> </ul> <a href="/sharing/?token=a9d96db4-f5dd-45f4-a218-35a6daa98074" target="_blank" rel="noopener">15</a> - Adjourn <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Next TAC meeting scheduled for July 31, to be held in person.</li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Potential special board meeting might be scheduled before July 3, but not confirmed yet.</li> </ul>