Meeting Summary - 05/09 PRS Meeting

Grid Monitor Staff Writer
05/15/2024

<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">2 - Approval of Minutes - Vote - Diana Coleman</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">2.1 - April 5, 2024</span></p> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Meeting minutes to be included on the combo ballot at the end of the agenda</span></li> </ul> <p><a href="https://dash3.gridmonitor.com/sharing/?token=81ee5aed-ef7b-4d0c-b1b0-d92097d46210"><span style="font-weight: 400;">3</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - TAC Update - Diana Coleman</span></p> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">ERCOT sent NPRR1212 for review and approval by TAC.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">TAC approved NPRR1212, which clarifies the distribution service providers' obligation to provide an ESI ID.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">TAC also approved ERCOT's 2024 PRS goals.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">TAC approved NPRR1212 and companion PGRR114.</span></li> </ul> <p><a href="https://dash3.gridmonitor.com/sharing/?token=e5f44296-8c20-417d-a4d8-6232c6457ebe"><span style="font-weight: 400;">4</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - Project Update - Troy Anderson</span></p> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">New securitization report to be posted on June 1st.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">NPRR1186 release pushed back to June 27th to allow for more testing.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">With the exception of SCR819 and NPRRR1111, June releases will go live on June 30th, in R5.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Market notice on SCR819 goes live on May 30th.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The more external facing components of the forecast presentation platform will move to R8 in August.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">NPRR1131, Controllable Load Resource Participation in Non-Spin, release target pushed to September</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">NPRR1058, resource offer modernization, may be paired with NPRR1131</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">NPRR1023 go-live target declared TBD due to CRR engine performance issues.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">MPIM effort redesign approach is ahead of schedule</span></li> </ul> <p><a href="https://dash3.gridmonitor.com/sharing/?token=32492430-ecf4-408e-8b52-9743af84da7e"><span style="font-weight: 400;">4.1</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - Review of Aging Projects</span></p> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Reduced the number of aging projects from 66 to 62, detailing specific tracking changes.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Reviewed individual projects such as SCR821 and NPRR1145 and discussed their resource allocation and target start dates.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The team analyzed the merge of projects NPRR1171 and NPRR1213, considering the impact on resource allocation and potential disruptions to deployment dates.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Further evaluation was planned for NPRR1006 and NPRR1128 to determine their priority and impact.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Members expressed support for the prioritization of NPRR1006, emphasizing its relevance to the ERCOT DR RFP and out-of-market actions.</span></li> </ul> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">5 - Urgency Vote - Vote - Diana Coleman</span></p> <p><a href="https://dash3.gridmonitor.com/sharing/?token=3ceee7f4-59d9-4ab5-bc0e-f56cba379855"><span style="font-weight: 400;">5.1</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - NPRR1228, Continued One-Winter Procurements for Firm Fuel Supply Service FFSS</span></p> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">PRS Motion: To grant NPRR1228 urgent status; to recommend approval of NPRR1228 as submitted and to forward to TAC NPRR1228 and the 05/02/24 IA.</span></li> </ul> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Motion carries with unanimous approval</span></p> <p><a href="https://dash3.gridmonitor.com/sharing/?token=afa7adf3-3e4b-4759-aedb-1f24af85a5ed"><span style="font-weight: 400;">5.2</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - NPRR1229, Real-Time Constraint Management Plan Energy Payment - Waive Notice &ndash; Possible Vote</span></p> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">They initially discussed waiving notice and proceeded to vote on it, with 85% in favor, 14% against, and 5 abstentions.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">They then discussed urgent status, with some participants stating that the NPRR will require further consideration and thorough review due to the policy changes and potential impacts.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">ERCOT representatives stated that there are still issues with the settlement language and other policy changes in the NPRR, and more discussions internally are needed.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Some participants expressed concern about the potential impact on resources and the need for specific details and approval in similar situations.</span></li> </ul> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">PRS Motion: To waive noticed for NPRR1229</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Motion carries</span></p> <p><a href="https://dash3.gridmonitor.com/sharing/?token=8442e1b0-8900-46b2-ae98-2c2f82bd7159"><span style="font-weight: 400;">5.3</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - NPRR1230, Methodology for Setting Transmission Shadow Price Caps for an IROL in SCED - Waive Notice &ndash; Possible Vote</span></p> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">ERCOT gave a high-level overview and presented their need for urgency, aiming to grant SCED control over a South Texas export IROL during summer using market tools.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bryan Sams expressed concerns about the NPRR language, including the ability to review and change the shadow price cap, and the notice for changes to the cap becoming effective.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The intent of the NPRR was to replace the need for HDL overrides, specifically during periods of system scarcity.</span></li> </ul> <p>&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">NPRR1230: PRS Motion: To waive notice for NPRR1230</span></li> </ul> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Motion carries with two abstentions</span></p> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">NPRR1230: PRS Motion: To grant NPRR1230 urgent status</span></li> </ul> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Motion carries, one opposed (Calpine), six abstentions.&nbsp;</span></p> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">NPRR1230: PRS Motion: To recommend approval of NPRR1230 as revised by PRS and to look forward to TAC NPRR1230 and the 05/07/2024 IA</span></li> </ul> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Motion carries unopposed, 12 abstentions.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><img src="/storage/docs/2024/05/NPRR1230%20PRS%20Ballot.png" width="539" height="531" /></span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">6 - Review PRS Reports, Impact Analyses, and Prioritization - Vote * denotes no impact</span></p> <p><a href="https://dash3.gridmonitor.com/sharing/?token=77489616-6aba-4317-9462-c251b7ca5c07"><span style="font-weight: 400;">6.1</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - NPRR1198, Congestion Mitigation Using Topology Reconfigurations</span></p> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">NPRR1198, Congestion Mitigation Using Topology Reconfigurations, sponsored by EDF Renewables.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Last month PRS recommended approval of NPRR1198 as amended by the March 8th LCRA comments.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The cost impact of the project was estimated to be between $50,000 and $80,000, with an annual recurring O&amp;M budget between $180,000 and $220,000, and an estimated project duration of 4 to 7 months.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Questions were raised around the implications and process of developing a congestion mitigation plan, particularly regarding cost impact and annual savings.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">A discussion occurred regarding the project's priority and rank, with considerations for the additional staff required for implementation and the potential to pilot or accelerate the project.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Stakeholders expressed support for the project, highlighting its importance for generators and the system, and emphasizing the willingness to facilitate its implementation.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">PRS Motion: To endorse and forward to TAC the 04/04/24 PRS Report and 04/30/24 IA for NPRR1198 with a recommended priority of 2025 and rank of 4520.</span></li> </ul> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The motion carries with three abstentions.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">6.2 - NPRR1218, REC Program Changes Per P.U.C. SUBST. R. 25.173, Renewable Energy Credit Program</span></p> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">NPRR1218 added to combo ballot</span></li> </ul> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">6.3 - NPRR1220, Market Restart Approval Process Modifications*</span></p> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">NPRR1220 added to combo ballot</span></li> </ul> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">6.4 - NPRR1222, Public Utility Commission of Texas Approval of the Methodology for Determining Ancillary Service Requirements*</span></p> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">NPRR1222 added to combo ballot</span></li> </ul> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">6.5 - NPRR1223, Addition of TA Contact Information Into TDSP Application Form*</span></p> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">NPRR1223 added to the combo ballot.</span></li> </ul> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">7 - Revision Requests Tabled at PRS - Possible Vote - Diana Coleman</span></p> <p><a href="https://dash3.gridmonitor.com/sharing/?token=dfba01ca-943c-4995-a147-bc524aecaee3"><span style="font-weight: 400;">7.5</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - NPRR1190, High Dispatch Limit Override Provision for Increased NOIE Load Costs</span></p> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">PRS Motion: To recommend approval of NPRR1190 as amended by the 03/26/24 Reliant comments</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Motion carries with eight abstentions.</span></li> </ul> <p><a href="https://dash3.gridmonitor.com/sharing/?token=47360fbc-b60b-4cb2-88f9-cbb56d430393"><span style="font-weight: 400;">7.9.1</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - NPRR1215, Clarifications to the Day-Ahead Market (DAM) Energy-Only Offer Calculation</span></p> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Tabled in February and referred to CFSG</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">ERCOT comments on April 12th, CFSG endorsed with ERCOT comments on April 18th</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Clarifications on credit calculations and handling of percentiles in DAM</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Incorporation of formula clarifications and as built corrections</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Addition of default value of e2 parameter</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">No policy change, as built language</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">NPRR1215 added to combo ballot</span></li> </ul> <p><a href="https://dash3.gridmonitor.com/sharing/?token=80d2cb55-bd0a-4a5c-830a-f77351caa098"><span style="font-weight: 400;">7.9.2</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - NPRR1216, Implementation of Emergency Pricing Program</span></p> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Last month tabled and referred to WMS</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Unanimously endorsed as amended by April 17th ERCOT comments</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">No opposition to combo ballot</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Confirmation from ERCOT that there are no additional fixed or non-variable costs included in the mailing payment</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Confirmation that there is a sentence explicitly stating there are no fixed costs</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">NPRR1216 added to the combo ballot</span></li> </ul> <p><a href="https://dash3.gridmonitor.com/sharing/?token=95384dcd-cebe-4607-b867-079fb324145c"><span style="font-weight: 400;">7.9.6</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - NPRR1224, ECRS Manual Deployment Triggers &ndash; URGENT - Nitika Mago</span></p> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">ERCOT reiterated that they don't support making any changes to the ECRS procurement methodology for the rest of 2024.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">ERCOT clarified that NPRR1224 was intended to be a summer 2024 item only and intends to file a future NPRR to incorporate additional items not covered in 1224.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">There were discussions on the procedural aspects of approving and implementing NPRR1224, including the possibility of the PUCT waiving the 30-day review period and allowing the NPRR to go into effect in July instead of August.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The meeting discussed the sensitivity analysis for different power balance penalty violation values and the potential impact of manual triggers on ECRS release.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">TCPA made comments about the energy bid curve, power balance penalty trigger, and preserving SCED dispatchable ECRS for frequency recovery.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Some members expressed support for the NPRR, while others (IMM, Austin Energy, Rhythm Ops) raised concerns about the offer price floor and its potential impact on procurement and availability of other reserves.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">There was a discussion on the operational and price signal aspects of the manual trigger for releasing ECRS and the potential impact on pricing outcomes in the real-time market.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">PRS Motion: To recommend approval of NPRR1224 as amended by the 04/30/24 TCPA comments as revised by PRS and to forward to TAC NPRR1224 and the 03/27/24 IA.</span></li> </ul> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Motion carries with two-thirds in favor, one third against, and six abstentions.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><img src="/storage/docs/2024/05/PRS%201224%20Ballot.png" width="557" height="550" /></span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">8 - Review of Revision Request Language - Vote - Diana Coleman</span></p> <p><a href="https://dash3.gridmonitor.com/sharing/?token=45eb44bb-849b-4048-8959-e47fc1fbe077"><span style="font-weight: 400;">8.1</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - NPRR1225, Exclusion of Lubbock Load from Securitization Charges</span></p> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Lubbock's transition to retail competition raised questions about the exclusion of customers served by Lubbock as TDSP from securitization charges</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">ERCOT sought guidance from the commission through petitions for declaratory order, and the commission confirmed that Lubbock customers should continue to have their load excluded from securitization uplift and default charges</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">ERCOT immediately incorporated this guidance in advance of the transition to competition.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">NPRR1225 now codifies these changes in the protocols, specifically in sections 26 for securitization default charges and section 27 for securitization uplift charges</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">NPRR1225 added to the combo ballot.</span></li> </ul> <p><a href="https://dash3.gridmonitor.com/sharing/?token=bd0b5ed7-87c6-410a-aa86-a28154ec6d0f"><span style="font-weight: 400;">8.2</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - NPRR1226, Demand Response Monitor</span></p> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">NPRR1226 introduced for creating a demand response monitor to assist market participants and ERCOT operators.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Proposed to disclose aggregated responses from loads for price and CP response, conservation alerts, etc.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Motion made to table and refer to WMS and ROS for further review and clarification on practical implementation.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">NPRR1226 only uses state estimator power numbers from the real-time system, not meters.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Support voiced by Calpine for the inclusion of demand response in resource adequacy projects.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Concern raised on protection of consumer information associated with collection of demand response data.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Question on potential tie-in or benefit gained from using demand response survey done by WMS and DSWG.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">NPRR1226 added to combo ballot for further review and reference to WMS.</span></li> </ul> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">9 - Notice of Withdrawal - Diana Coleman</span></p> <p><a href="https://dash3.gridmonitor.com/sharing/?token=41439bdf-fe00-4c8b-a5b8-21b2eda40d7b"><span style="font-weight: 400;">9.1</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - NPRR1162, Single Agent Designation for a QSE and its Sub-QSEs for Voice Communications over the ERCOT WAN</span></p> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">NPRR1162 has been formally withdrawn.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The withdrawal is due to SCR825 crossing the finish line.</span></li> </ul> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">10 - Other Business - Diana Coleman</span></p> <p><a href="https://dash3.gridmonitor.com/sharing/?token=5191b1c7-3291-4343-a822-76d1210f4673"><span style="font-weight: 400;">10.1</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - NPRR1231, FFSS Program Communication Improvements and Additional</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"><br /></span><span style="font-weight: 400;"> Clarifications</span></p> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Not up for vote, just for awareness, NPRR1231 will be on the June 5th WMS agenda.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Discussion on the urgent need for improvements in communication and coordination during emergency situations within ERCOT.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">No urgency in waiving notice for NPRR1231</span></li> </ul> <p><a href="https://dash3.gridmonitor.com/sharing/?token=7fc37db9-d0aa-437a-a0ee-dcf8c4b8bbf7"><span style="font-weight: 400;">11</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - Combo Ballot - Vote - Diana Coleman</span></p> <p><img src="/storage/docs/2024/05/PRS%20COMBO%20BALLOT%20DETAILS.png" width="557" height="112" /></p> <p><img src="/storage/docs/2024/05/PRS%20COMBO%20BALLOT%20.png" width="560" height="561" /></p>