Meeting Summary - 11/11/24 WMWG Meeting

Grid Monitor AI
11/12/2024

<p><img src="/storage/docs/2024/11/WMWG%2011:11:24%20Hero.png" width="870" height="654" /></p> <p><a href="/sharing/?token=8997bf7d-a579-4f57-8cda-8b54a46ec65b"><span style="font-weight: 400;">1</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - Antitrust Admonition - Blake Holt</span></p> <p><a href="/sharing/?token=f9e48652-5791-4b26-b51f-1fe8304b34db"><span style="font-weight: 400;">2</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - Questions on Standing Reports - WMWG Participants</span></p> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">No participants raised any specific questions.</span></li> </ul> <p><a href="/sharing/?token=a4c44f22-51e4-4634-977b-91ee53a28f04"><span style="font-weight: 400;">3</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - DAM Communications Update - Curry Holden</span></p> <p><a href="/storage/docs/2024/11/DAMCommunicationsUpdate.pdf"><span style="font-weight: 400;">DAMCommunicationsUpdate.pdf</span></a></p> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">DAM Team plans to improve communication by implementing hourly notices during extended events.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">New documentation protocol will include urgent notifications tagged as 'DAM Notice:' with standardized keyword phrases for easy identification.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Updates will include DAM status update, DAM close postponement, DAM solution postponement, and DAM abort notice templates.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Goals include improved transparency and maintaining awareness of current DAM conditions and any required actions.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Changes to be implemented by December 4, 2023, without altering current communication systems.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Discussion on the location of standardized market communications&mdash;originally in the Commercial Operations Guide&mdash;suggesting potential need to update the guide or protocols.</span></li> </ul> <p><a href="/sharing/?token=274ef2c6-c0fc-417a-80b0-a8e92dd274d8"><span style="font-weight: 400;">4</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - EPS Meter Issue - Randy Roberts</span></p> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The EPS meter issue led to some resettlements at the end of 2023.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The issue was due to an EPS meter being incorrectly stopped.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">A question was raised about how the issue happened and what mitigation measures were implemented.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Randy Roberts was expected to provide an overview but was unavailable.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Attempts were made to locate Randy Roberts for further discussion.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The agenda moved to the next item as Randy was not available.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Austin Rosel gives an update of the mitigation measures moving forward at the end of agenda item 7.</span></li> </ul> <p><a href="/sharing/?token=b46c5008-3fda-4d7f-96d0-e81dad60beb7"><span style="font-weight: 400;">5</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - Open Action Item Discussion - Blake Holt</span></p> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Review of open action items for WMWG, aiming to clear outdated items unless retained or sponsored for progress.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Amanda redlined a document for WMS, focusing on federal EPA actions' impacts on the ERCOT grid, suggesting the need for updates from ERCOT or generation segments.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Discussion on reviewing wholesale market cues for scarcity pricing, currently no specific tasks outside ongoing NPRRs; suggestion to seek direction from WMS.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Parking lot items require a champion or specific task from WMS to progress; previously addressed NPRR issues include wholesale storage load information publication.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Task suggestions lacked progression due to absence of champions, highlighting the need for a task-oriented approach and market participant involvement.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The approach of assigning champions to facilitate progress through offline discussions and defining required information was supported.</span></li> </ul> <p><a href="/sharing/?token=26d48ef8-a564-4278-bff0-6589497c4b8e"><span style="font-weight: 400;">6</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - NPRR1229, RTM CMP Energy Payment &ndash; New Comments - Lucas Turner</span></p> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Comments submitted to add further scope limitations.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Prohibition on payments if the resource agreed to conditions causing it to go offline.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Reduction of maximum operating days for payment recovery from 10 to 4.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Cap on breakage costs set at $500,000.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Language updated to replace RTM opportunity cost and more closely align with NPRR1190 and HDL override payment recovery.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Concerns raised about policy approach and comparison to NPRR1190 discussed.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Discussion about an annual cap on similar costs.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Feedback from ERCOT that the language was initially okay at draft stage.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Discussion of additional revisions and tweaks required, including the removal of the lost opportunity payment mention.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Conversation around the CMP formula needing more comprehensive revision.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">A suggestion to wait for NPRR1190 resolution to align NPRR1229 with its framework.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Discussion on delaying the next steps to permit further refinement and incorporation of feedback.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Scheduling implications related to upcoming TAC meetings and decision timelines.</span></li> </ul> <p><a href="/sharing/?token=c7e658ad-b41b-4bcd-a596-5af450e0e4b4"><span style="font-weight: 400;">7</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - Group Discussion on CARD/CRRBA Allocation Methods - WMWG Participants</span></p> <p><a href="/storage/docs/2024/11/08.%20%20WMWG%20update%20on%20CARD%20and%20CRRBA%20allocation%20options.pdf"><span style="font-weight: 400;">WMWGupdateonCARDandCRRBAallocationoptions.pdf</span></a></p> <p><a href="/storage/docs/2024/11/COGProposalonCARDandCRRBAAllocation110624.pdf"><span style="font-weight: 400;">COGProposalonCARDandCRRBAAllocation110624.pdf</span></a></p> <p><a href="/storage/docs/2024/11/08-card-allocation-proposal.pdf"><span style="font-weight: 400;">08-card-allocation-proposal.pdf</span></a></p> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Discussion of three proposals for CARD/CRRBA allocation: IMM method, VISTRA method, and City of Georgetown proposal.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">IMM method allocates based on top 500 hours in a month.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">VISTRA method uses a two-factor methodology focusing on 60 to 120 hours within a month.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">City of Georgetown proposal allocates based on 4CP.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">WMS seeks consensus to vote on a direction by December meeting for ERCOT to draft an NPRR.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Concerns raised about the City of Georgetown proposal potentially causing unintended consequences due to its approach of connecting separate concepts.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">ERCOT expresses appreciation for discussions and reveals uneasiness about the Georgetown proposal due to potential misalignment of incentives.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Discussion over potential incentives for residential customers under the Georgetown proposal, affirming limited capability for incentivization under current structures.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Shams presents a City of Georgetown proposal emphasizing a straightforward solution to align CARD allocation with 4CP to reduce market distortion.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Proposal for allocation of CARD on a system-wide basis instead of zonal basis due to current misalignments.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Discussion regarding the alignment of CARD allocation methodologies with how congestion is paid in reality.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Various stakeholders express their positions: LCRA favors the VISTRA method, ERCOT does not have additional proposals, Coleman Lewis from Fargo Resources questions incentive structures.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">ERCOT has shared data about proposal impacts that has been part of presentations but has not independently analyzed dollar shifts.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Next steps include possible vote at the December 4th WMS meeting.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Austin Rosel provides updates on ERCOT addressing an issue related to the EPS meter stopping by increasing internal reviews and announcing a significant project to automate processes to reduce errors.</span></li> </ul> <p><a href="/sharing/?token=df01c394-b316-4209-9ae0-a486f559965b"><span style="font-weight: 400;">8</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - Other Business - Blake Holt</span></p> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><strong>Speaker: Eric Goff</strong></li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2"><strong>Topic:</strong><span style="font-weight: 400;"> Large Load Report</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2"><strong>Highlights:</strong></li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="3"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Discussed potential formalization of the large load report.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="3"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Addressed challenges with customer data privacy under Texas law.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="3"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Suggested aggregation method to protect customer identity.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="3"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Proposed guidelines for ERCOT to develop a detailed report.</span></li> </ul> </ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><strong>Speaker: Bob Wittmeyer</strong></li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2"><strong>Topic:</strong><span style="font-weight: 400;"> Data Categorization</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2"><strong>Highlights:</strong></li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="3"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Suggested more generic categorization for data types such as 'flexible' and 'firm'.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="3"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Discussion on the registration of load type under NPRR1234.</span></li> </ul> </ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><strong>Speaker: David Detelich, CPS Energy</strong></li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2"><strong>Topic:</strong><span style="font-weight: 400;"> Load Forecast and Battery Charging</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2"><strong>Highlights:</strong></li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="3"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Inquired about battery charging accounting in load forecasts.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="3"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Discussion on NPRR related to real-time signal masking.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="3"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Confirmation of a future presentation addressing load forecasts.</span></li> </ul> </ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><strong>Speaker: Coleman Lewis, Targa Resources</strong></li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2"><strong>Topic:</strong><span style="font-weight: 400;"> ERCOT Analysis on Card Allocation Proposals</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2"><strong>Highlights:</strong></li> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="3"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Requested ERCOT analysis on how CARD allocation proposals affect dollar distribution.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="3"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Clarification that past analysis was not performed by ERCOT.</span></li> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="3"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Discussion about the possibility of a historical assessment by ERCOT.</span></li> </ul> </ul> </ul> <p><a href="/sharing/?token=aa59bbc6-6678-4df4-822f-20b16f30839a"><span style="font-weight: 400;">9</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - Adjourn - Blake Holt</span></p> <ul> <li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Next meeting scheduled for December 10th.</span></li> </ul> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">&nbsp;</span></p> <p><br /><br /></p>