Meeting Summary - Reliability and Markets Committee Meeting
Grid Monitor Staff Writer
04/22/2024
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><img src="/storage/docs/2024/04/RMC%20photo.png" /></span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><a href="https://app.gridmonitor.com/sharing/?token=20526fbd-1b0c-4fca-91ce-2c49987a9ee6" target="_blank" rel="noopener">2</a> - Notice of Public Comment - Bob Flex</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Eric Goff and Mark Alstrom on behalf of Nextera, Sarah Parsons for Avangrid, and Omar Martino for Invenergy expressed an interest in commenting on Nodal operating guide revision request NOGRR245.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><a href="https://app.gridmonitor.com/sharing/?token=2aa99e36-9043-4e83-9782-3a74957fa96a" target="_blank" rel="noopener">3</a> - Meeting Minutes - Bob Flex</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The meeting minutes were approved unanimously.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">4 - TAC Report regarding R&M Committee - Colin Martin</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Agenda item 4: TAC Report regarding R&M Committee charter revision request recommended for board approval.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><a href="https://app.gridmonitor.com/sharing/?token=2200b20d-2c53-40b6-bce3-9e72fe0dc18b" target="_blank" rel="noopener">4.1</a> - <a href="/controls/ercot/?control=NPRR1197" target="_blank" rel="noopener">NPRR1197</a> - Colin Martin</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">NPRR1197, addressing the optional exclusion of load from netting at ERCOT PD settlement metering facilities, was presented by Colin Martin, vice chair of TAC.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The revision request aims to allow resources to separately meter and settle loads located behind the EPS metering point at the resource's point of interconnection.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The justification for the revision is that netting auxiliary loads can impact the expected performance of the projects, and the proposed language enables a resource to exclude loads from a netting arrangement and settle them with a separate TDSP and load serving entity.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">There was one opposing vote from the cooperative segment due to concerns that the revision codifies in the protocols a metering arrangement they had attempted to prohibit in a separate, recently rejected revision request, NPRR1194.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">This opposing vote also represents a general objection to how netted loads are treated in protocols in relation to energy storage resources.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Unanimously approved.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><a href="https://app.gridmonitor.com/sharing/?token=e97f1e6d-d41e-469c-a469-6b230b46ea29" target="_blank" rel="noopener">4.2 </a>- <a href="/controls/ercot/?control=NOGRR245" target="_blank" rel="noopener">NOGRR245</a> - Colin Martin</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">ERCOT initiated NOGRR245 in response to the increasing penetrations of inverter-based resources and observed disturbances</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The proposal aims to replace current voltage ride through requirements for intermittent renewable resources with inverter-based resources</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Discussions on NOGRR245 have taken place in multiple stakeholder groups, with 76 associated items filed as of the last count</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">After protracted and robust debate, NOGRR245 was finally approved by TAC with 69% voting in favor.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><a href="https://app.gridmonitor.com/sharing/?token=311e2cac-0405-4e17-9a9c-0bee9cb3ad0d" target="_blank" rel="noopener">4.2.1</a> - ERCOT Comments- Colin Martin</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">ERCOT remains opposed to Comments approved at TAC due to three main reliability concerns: 1) lack of consideration of system reliability when assessing exemptions, 2) potential for indefinite exemptions from ride-through requirements, and 3) timeline of the effective date.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">ERCOT would like RMC to remand to TAC to reconsider due to the narrow margin by which NOGRR245 passed.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><a href="https://app.gridmonitor.com/sharing/?token=c7e0566a-a2ee-46c7-b2b3-1ec24b763243" target="_blank" rel="noopener">4.2.2</a> - Stakeholder Comments - Eric Goff</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Eric Goff is solely representing Nextera but sharing the views of the joint commenters</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Requesting that RMC approve the TAC recommendation</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Emphasized avoidance of retroactive requirements due to chilling effect on investment</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Emphasized commercial reasonability as a standard</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Sarah Parsons spoke for Avangrid and emphasized regulatory certainty and procedural transparency</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Omar Martino for Invenergy spoke, emphasizing the importance of commercial reasonableness and avoiding retroactive requirements for investment decisions</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Mark Alstrom for Nextera also spoke in favor of the TAC-approved comments</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">After robust discussion and questions, NOGRR245 was remanded to TAC with Courtney Hjaltman abstaining and the other three members approving the motion</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><a href="https://app.gridmonitor.com/sharing/?token=5ff27ef5-1066-4527-8c3b-b904aac80a50" target="_blank" rel="noopener">5</a> - Recommendation regarding San Antonio South Reliability - Kristi Hobbs</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Kristi Hobbs presented the recommendation for an additional reliability project in the San Antonio area, asking for endorsement and designation as critical for reliability</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The project involves rebuilding two current 345kV lines, expanding right away, and adding a new substation to increase the region's reliability</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The project was recommended unanimously by TAC and designated as critical to the reliability of the ERCOT system</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The project is part of a phased approach, with phase one being the CPS South of San Antonio project</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">It was noted that additional projects may be needed in the future to meet the demands of the state's evolving resource mix</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The motion to recommend the project to the board was approved unanimously</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">6 - Market Price Corrections - Woody Rickerson</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><a href="https://app.gridmonitor.com/sharing/?token=ebd753ab-b3bf-46fe-9d00-76cea319e7fc" target="_blank" rel="noopener">6.1</a> - Incorrect Line - Woody Rickerson</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Issue with incorrect line series device and transformer ratings identified in January</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Implemented a fix on January 30th to ensure correct static ratings for transmission lines</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Market notice put out on February 5th</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Impact analysis completed on March 12</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Three operating days identified for board approval</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Issue rooted in new EMs installed in November, now fixed</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Motion to approve item 6.1 made and approved</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><a href="https://app.gridmonitor.com/sharing/?token=b0ffa5df-3335-45ce-a833-60222e1c10e9" target="_blank" rel="noopener">6.2</a> - Incorrect Constraint Data for GTCs - Woody Rickerson</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">On February 28th, a routine maintenance process led to the deletion of a constraint in the Market Management System, impacting the real-time market.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The constraint deletion was a result of a downstream production change, which didn't show up in the Energy Management System, leading to market impact.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">On March 1st, ERCOT issued a notice for impact analysis, followed by notifying the market on March 18th about the results needed for board review.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Seven counterparties were affected, with the largest impact being $455,000 and an overall impact of $277,000.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The downstream production change process was identified as the root cause, designed to accommodate last-minute system changes, but in this case, an error occurred.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">There are approximately 7-8 weekly database loads requiring production changes, which are vulnerable to errors, and their increasing numbers are being monitored.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Recommendations were made to track and control the number of downstream changes and to address them in upcoming meetings.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Motion to approve ERCOT recommendation approved unanimously</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><a href="https://app.gridmonitor.com/sharing/?token=dcda3d0f-8d63-4503-963f-dfd4ce69835c" target="_blank" rel="noopener">7</a> - Independent Market Monitor - Jeff McDonald</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Jeff McDonald is the new director of the Independent Market Monitor (IMM) for ERCOT.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">He has been focusing on ECRS rule change issues, working collaboratively with PUC and ERCOT staff.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The IMM is also involved in an Ancillary services study, with positive cooperation among all parties.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">They are gearing up for more effort in the performance credit mechanism space and preparing the state of the market report, which will be forwarded to the PUC staff for review on May 1st.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">There are also less pressing market rule changes that the IMM has been engaged in</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><a href="https://app.gridmonitor.com/sharing/?token=89dbc43e-d037-425b-a43d-00f20ded4445" target="_blank" rel="noopener">8</a> - Committee Briefs - Kristi Hobbs</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Kristi Hobbs presented an update on system planning and weatherization.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The presentation likely touched on preparations for extreme weather events and system planning improvements.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><a href="https://app.gridmonitor.com/sharing/?token=4718c5f9-87e8-4b51-a681-7b3ce89f1a90" target="_blank" rel="noopener">8.1</a> - System Planning and Weatherization Update - Kristi Hobbs</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">340 generation resource and 129 TSP winter weatherization inspections completed</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Non-RRR force outage levels have improved since standards were implemented</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Summer inspections goal is to complete over 600 inspections</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">New tool to improve communication between ERCOT and market participants</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Permian Basin study underway to complete a reliability study plan by July</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Load forecast for 2030 is nearly 24,000 MW, with significant growth in the Permian area</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Estimated need for substantial transmission to support load growth in the Permian area</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Anticipated need for 565 miles of new 345 kV upgrades and over 300 miles of new 138 kV lines.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Significant load growth projected in 2024 regional transmission plan, with potential challenges in balancing generation and load</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Large portion of new resource development coming from solar and batteries</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Large load integration increasing, with over 4500 MW approved for energization</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Remaining significant challenges in summer weatherization inspections</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Increased instrumentation failures during summer inspections</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Retrofitting and record-keeping challenges observed during summer weatherization inspections</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Potential correlations between load growth, changes in legislation, and planning rules</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Breakdown of load growth figures and the need for additional insight on A.I. operated data centers</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><a href="https://app.gridmonitor.com/sharing/?token=f6c9c7d6-a893-475c-b9c9-0e84ccecc153" target="_blank" rel="noopener">8.2</a> - System Operations Update - Dan Woodfin</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">All-time winter peak set in January</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Discussion on research attitudes, eclipse, and ECRS</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Maximum daily resource planned outage capacity discussed, seeking stakeholder feedback</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Successful management during solar eclipse, additional ancillary services committed</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">ECRS release focus on near scarcity conditions, proposed NPRR for stakeholder feedback</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;"><a href="/controls/ercot/?control=NPRR1224" target="_blank" rel="noopener">NPRR1224</a> tabled at PRS, unlikely to be approved before summer</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Commission suggests aiming for approval at June board meeting</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Prioritizing reliability and cost impacts for consumers in ECRS discussions</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><a href="https://app.gridmonitor.com/sharing/?token=df2e0117-06b4-4b6a-af25-9513ee2f1797" target="_blank" rel="noopener">8.3</a> - Commercial Markets Update - Woody Rickerson</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Woody Rickerson provided an update on the commercial markets addressing ADERs. He mentioned that there are no new developments in that area and that they continue to work on qualifying it for ECRS.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">No new ADERs have been added since the last update.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><a href="https://app.gridmonitor.com/sharing/?token=bd485558-972e-450b-8e5f-f5eb5c0e7cf5" target="_blank" rel="noopener">8.3.1</a> - Real-Time Co-optimization Update - Matt Mereness</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The Real-Time Co-optimization (RTC) involves 75 departments and 150 people, representing a significant operational shift for ERCOT</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Progress has been made with technology and security aspects, with regular meetings and code deliveries in progress</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Market readiness design issues are being addressed through workshops and engagement with market participants</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Key outstanding design issues include RUC capacity shortage and online hydro resources</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Discussion on the reshaping of Ancillary service demand curves, with potential policy changes at the PUC level and implications for market trials in May of next year</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><a href="https://app.gridmonitor.com/sharing/?token=fbdc68f3-9db8-47b7-a277-25cca3e2a029" target="_blank" rel="noopener">8.4</a> - Market Credit Update - Austin Rosel</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Market Credit Update presented by Austin Rosel</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">No action requested, just an update on statistics, NPRRs, and defaults</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Total potential exposure and average discretionary collateral noted</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">New NPRR1165 revisions implemented on April 1st, requiring all market participants to post an independent amount for each counterparty</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Four defaults due to market participants not meeting the requirement</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Defaulted participants no longer qualify until they clear the default</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Implemented NPRR1205 to strengthen credit requirements for LC issuing banks and insurance companies</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Top 10 banks based on LC utilization discussed, highlighting potential issues with overallocation</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">A cleanup NPRR introduced to better specify credit calculation details, with no policy changes proposed</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><a href="https://app.gridmonitor.com/sharing/?token=d8b01c0c-049d-4e00-9871-030ba8fd8fe5" target="_blank" rel="noopener">8.5</a> - Revision Request Status Update - Ann Boren</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Four revision requests for April board consideration, less volume but not lacking in content</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Discussion on NOGRR245 and RMGRR1197, with opposing votes from TAC</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">11 new revision requests filed from the February board meeting</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">19 revision requests approved at the PUC last week</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">49 revision requests in process with budgetary impact details, sponsorship, and reasons for revision</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">14 revision requests on aging list, NPRR1162 withdrawn, recent comments on NPRR1188 and NPRR1190</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">29 revision requests approved by board and PUC this year</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Some revision requests are waiting on legislation or ongoing lawsuits</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">No NPRRs currently elevated to the level of NOGRR245, possibly NPRR1070</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><a href="https://app.gridmonitor.com/sharing/?token=7a79caa0-a17a-4fbb-bcd5-1740bdd7e21d" target="_blank" rel="noopener">9</a> - Future Agenda Items - Woody Rickerson</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Mention of the discussion around the ECRS requested for the June meeting by Commissioner Cobos</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Request for more information on the production changes discussed earlier</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><a href="https://app.gridmonitor.com/sharing/?token=70cf3b05-91f1-49a2-b46c-c4aee83d6d6e" target="_blank" rel="noopener">10</a> - Other Business - Bob Flexon</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Discussion on the market notice that came out concerning the reliability must run determination for the CPS Braunig units</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Explanation on the RMR analysis and its impact on the transmission system</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Consideration of alternative resources for must run alternatives</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">CPS's anticipated suspending operations of those units in April 2025</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">ERCOT's plan to file something with the commission for a different timeline for the RFP to evaluate the cost of keeping those units around</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Need for committee and board evaluation of benefits and costs of potential must run alternatives</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Consideration of an exit strategy for the RMR, potentially a transmission solution</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">12 - Adjournment - Bob Flex</span></p>