<p><img src="/storage/docs/2024/08/20240827TACHERO.png" width="570" height="428" /></p>
<p><a href="/sharing/?token=37a7248f-03aa-4e3c-84ba-27f1d171394d"><span style="font-weight: 400;">1 </span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">- Antitrust Admonition - Caitlin Smith</span></p>
<p><a href="/sharing/?token=d7f1aa69-ebc5-41d3-89be-fe88986378d4"><span style="font-weight: 400;">2 </span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">- </span><span style="font-weight: 400;"> </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Approval of TAC Meeting Minutes</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - Caitlin Smith</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Approval of July 31 meeting minutes on the combo ballot.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><a href="/sharing/?token=5cd012e0-00cd-448d-a081-01b03d81e865"><span style="font-weight: 400;">3 </span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">- </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Meeting </span><a href="https://ercot-control-docs.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/21/3-meeting-updates.zip"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Updates</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">August Board/PUCT Meetings - Caitlin Smith</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Board approved most revision requests recommended by TAC.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">NPRR1190 tabled at the board; </span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Concerns raised over ERCOT taking on roles traditionally managed by TAC and how ERCOT plans to represent stakeholders.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Plans to allow stakeholders to present their positions directly to the board were highlighted.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Future workshops to flesh out process details and stakeholder input.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Discussions on the existing comprehensive records available to the board for reference.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><a href="/sharing/?token=90b7fa79-ecc0-4cfe-bafc-ddf8f33e2021"><span style="font-weight: 400;">3.1</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - IBR Bifurcated NOGRR Related to NOGRR245</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">NOGRR245 was approved by the board after comments from ERCOT and joint commenters.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The board designated a subsequent NOGRR as a priority to address exemption process details and hardware requirements.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">ERCOT is waiting for commission approval of NOGRR245 before filing the subsequent NOGRR.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Possibility that the subsequent NOGGR will be a rulemaking instead, PUC to discuss on September 26, 2024.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><a href="/sharing/?token=5d2f2a15-be45-4797-afb2-1fc2b8409a1b"><span style="font-weight: 400;">3.2</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - Board Remand of NPRR1215, Clarifications to the Day-Ahead Market - DAM - Energy-Only Offer Calculation - Vote</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Austin Rosel mentioned that questions came up after sending NPRR1215 back to the board after finding the formula error, furthering investigation into those questions.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Motion to table NPRR1215 added to combo ballot</span></li>
</ul>
<p><a href="/sharing/?token=9e1fc349-f032-4c1f-ba6b-3a07278cdbdc"><span style="font-weight: 400;">4 </span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">- Review of Revision Request Summary/ERCOT Market Impact Statement/Opinions - Ann Boren/ IMM</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Revision Request </span><a href="https://ercot-control-docs.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/27/4-revision-request-summary.zip"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Summary</span></a></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Eight revision requests on the TAC agenda this month.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">ERCOT supports all revision requests with positive market impact statements.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">IMM has no opinion on the revision requests.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">CFSG has reviewed them and found no credit implications.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Five relate to general system process improvements.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Two are due to regulatory requirements.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">One request is a board and PUC directive.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><a href="/sharing/?token=0a03e371-9e4a-46d9-8215-907e7451e0a1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">5 </span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">- PRS Report - Vote - Diana Coleman</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Diana Coleman provided the August PRS </span><a href="https://ercot-control-docs.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/21/5-prs-report.zip"><span style="font-weight: 400;">report</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><a href="/sharing/?token=c6860b65-44a8-4eae-8be3-85cc1e7e4486"><span style="font-weight: 400;">5.1</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - NPRR1221, Related to NOGRR262, Provisions for Operator-Controlled Manual Load Shed</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Motion to recommend approval of NPRR1221 as recommended by PRS in the 8/8/24 PRS Report added to combo ballot.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><a href="/sharing/?token=0e57d05f-6a2f-4bc0-a26b-1d90509ef0ac"><span style="font-weight: 400;">5.2</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - NPRR1236, RTC+B Modifications to RUC Capacity Short Calculations</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Motion to recommend approval of NPRR1236 as recommended by PRS in the 8/8/24 PRS Report added to combo ballot.</span></li>
</ul>
<p> </p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">NOTE: ERCOT ISO's final readiness process update given by Shane Herrera relating to NERC reliability standard EOP 11 Version 4, R2 part 2.2.9, enforceable from October 1, 2024.</span></li>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="2"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Notice to be directed to NERC TOPs within the ERCOT interconnection.</span></li>
</ul>
</ul>
<p><a href="/sharing/?token=6920d1f7-2c04-4eac-8b8f-c69a24014263"><span style="font-weight: 400;">6</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - Revision Requests Tabled at TAC - Possible Vote - Caitlin Smith.</span></p>
<p><a href="/sharing/?token=d294bd1f-18a1-4106-8f2c-eb3b0ebbc970"><span style="font-weight: 400;">6.1</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - OBDRR046, Related to NPRR1188, Implement Nodal Dispatch and Energy Settlement for Controllable Load Resources</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">OBDRR046 remains tabled.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><a href="/sharing/?token=919aa20e-b52c-4a11-af1c-f8c1ea5b8ca2"><span style="font-weight: 400;">6.2</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - NPRR1227, Related to RMGRR181, Alignment of Defined Term Usage and Resolution of Inconsistencies</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Recommendation to approve NPRR1227 as per PRS's recommendation in the July 18 PRS report</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Suggestion to handle RMGRR181 concurrently as recommended by RMS in the 86 RMS report</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Motion to recommend approval of NPRR1227 as recommended by PRS in the 7/18/24 PRS Report, and o recommend approval of RMGRR181 as recommended by RMS in the 8/6/24 RMS Report, added to the combo ballot</span></li>
</ul>
<p><a href="/sharing/?token=59772112-a71f-4663-a7fc-ff1f9cd03adb"><span style="font-weight: 400;">7</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - OBDRR052, Related to NPRR1246, Energy Storage Resource Terminology Alignment for the Single-Model Era - Vote</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Motion to table OBDRR052 added to combo ballot.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><a href="/sharing/?token=41572c10-095f-4c6b-b330-5d3a82b742c2"><span style="font-weight: 400;">8</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - RMS </span><a href="https://ercot-control-docs.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/26/8-rms-report.zip"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Report</span></a></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">RMGRR181, Alignment of Defined Term Usage and Resolution of Inconsistencies - Debbie McKeever</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">RMGRR181 was unanimously approved.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">RMGRR181 and NPRR are companion pieces, not changing any processes, just removing some definitions and aligning language with ERCOT protocol 2.1.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">RMGRR181 placed on the combo ballot.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Debbie McKeever briefed on Texas SET 5.0 and MarkeTrak SCR817, set to implement on November 9.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The primary benefit of Texas SET 5.0 and MarkeTrak changes is the improvement in managing inadvertent gains, reducing manual processing and providing better logging and tracking.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">County codes will improve weather moratorium processes by providing additional data, enhancing visibility in extreme weather.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">New service handling codes introduced to better communicate during major weather incidents.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">LP&L transition completed months ago, but billing and usage processes still under weekly review.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The task force for the transition will continue until the end of the year to incorporate lessons learned and manage Texas SET 5.0 upgrade.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><a href="/sharing/?token=5331b032-faf2-4ea2-b4e3-45d104f00710"><span style="font-weight: 400;">9</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - ROS </span><a href="https://ercot-control-docs.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/21/9-ros-report.zip"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Report</span></a></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">NOGRR262, Provisions for Operator-Controlled Manual Load Shed- Katie Rich</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Motion to recommend approval of NOGRR262 as recommended by ROS in the 8/1/24 ROS Report added to combo ballot.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><a href="/sharing/?token=c6b68ed4-77fa-4543-88c5-b80fcacd0ed8"><span style="font-weight: 400;">10</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - WMS </span><a href="https://ercot-control-docs.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/21/10-wms-report.zip"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Report</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - Eric Blakey (click </span><a href="/news/articles/?id=10280"><span style="font-weight: 400;">here</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> for Grid Monitor WMS Summary)</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">WMS met on August 7, where several reports were given.</span></li>
</ul>
<h3><strong>Reports</strong></h3>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Jeff McDonald provided the Annual update from the IMM on the state of the market report and recommendations.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">2024 Q2 Settlement Stability Report showed price changes, resettlements disputes, cost allocation, winter storm Uri securitization monthly uplift charges.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">2024 Q2 Unregistered DG Report showed a total of 2,643 MW of unregistered DG, new DG battery storage information from ERCOT.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Auction Revenue Distribution Card and CRR Balancing Account (CRRBA) showed ERCOT and IMM concern on potential uneconomic behavior, discussion to be continued at WMWG's September 24 meeting.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">HDL-LDL Override Report highlighted solar generation range during April 8 eclipse 13,792 MW - 734 MW.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Large Load Interconnection Report showed the interconnection queue status stands at more than 52,000 MW, an increase of 4,636 MW since July update.</span></li>
</ul>
<h3><strong>Revision Requests</strong></h3>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">VCMRR041: Rejected in favor of VCMRR042, proposed by Luminant, which is tabled and referred to RCWG.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">NPRR1242: ERCOT has concerns over setting precedents for parsing out fees.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">NPRR1226: WMS endorsed despite concerns about new dashboards.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">NPRR1238: Tabled and referred to WMWG.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><a href="/sharing/?token=eb30f4c5-63dd-486c-b6ba-4ea7e1b86278"><span style="font-weight: 400;">11</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - Credit Finance Sub Group </span><a href="https://ercot-control-docs.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/27/11-cfsg-report.zip"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Report</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - Vote - Brenden Sager</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Discussed estimate aggregate liability change proposals and administrative update on NPRR1215.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">NPRR1215 had a formula error, specifically in the e2 parameter of the credit formula.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Clarified e1 parameter in NPRR1215; no vote was taken.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Focused on changes to the estimated aggregate liability, part of collateral requirements for market participants.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Explained max exposure calculation over a 40-day look back period.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Highlighted the forward adjustment factors and their role in collateral requirements; weighted ratio of forward north hub prices over settlement prices.</span></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Discussion on ERCOT's current system: real-time component, 40-day look-back period for real-time liability, real-time forward adjustment factor, day-ahead liability, and forward adjustment factors.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Consideration of netting real-time and day-ahead invoices and the implications.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Review of six different scenarios impacting the credit form, focusing on under-collateralization and overcollateralization to reduce market costs.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Potential adjustments: shorten the 40-day look-back period, implement caps and floors on forward adjustment factors, aiming to reduce volatility and liquidity jumps.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Discussed whether smaller, easy adjustments could be implemented early, while larger changes like netting are more complex.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Presentation of data on forward adjustment factors and the justification for caps and floors.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Review of three new NPRRs, deemed operational with no changes required for credit monitoring or liability calculations.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Monthly highlights: decrease in TPE from 2.18 billion to 1.81 billion, decrease in discretionary collateral from 4.23 billion to 4.15 billion.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Allocation of credit instruments to ERCOT, predominantly letters of credit, cash, and a few surety bonds.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Discussion on discretionary collateral and the priority to avoid over and under-collateralization in the market.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Update on ERCOT's credit limit issuer problems, noting an improvement in the number of issuers in the warning category.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Vote on addition to the membership of CFSG to be added to the combo ballot.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><a href="/sharing/?token=71166969-6a94-4212-9b9e-ee7a9da98dca"><span style="font-weight: 400;">12</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - RTC+B Task Force </span><a href="https://ercot-control-docs.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/23/12-rtc-b-task-force-report.zip"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Report</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - Matt Mereness</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">ERCOT is finalizing the project schedule, emphasizing the importance of aligning dates for market trials and resolving outstanding issues.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">There is a possibility of going live by the end of 2025, but not later than September 2026.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Ongoing work on aligning business requirements with current protocols and updating technical specifications.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">ERCOT's RTC simulator is nearing completion and will be used to run historical data to study price convergence.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Market readiness and trials plan include comments on the load frequency control test and the attestation scorecard showing significant engagement.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Discussion on deferring NPRR1245 and NPRR1246 for additional review due to numerous small changes.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Upcoming review of proxy offer curves, market readiness, training modules, and potential changes to AS demand curves.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The simulation tool won't be accessible to market participants initially but will publish price formations.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Stakeholders expressed the need for more comprehensive data and analysis from ERCOT simulations.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Confirmation that TAC approval and NPRR submission will be required for changes to AS demand curves.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><a href="/sharing/?token=bc44ccc9-4882-4310-8a16-c6d2bdad84da"><span style="font-weight: 400;">13</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - ERCOT 2025 Membership Application and Agreement </span><a href="https://ercot-control-docs.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/21/13-ercot-reports.zip"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Updates</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - Katherine Gross</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Application process begins September 20 and ends November 20.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Last year switched to online applications; addressed issues like viewing submitted forms, confusion with question marks, and payment process.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Clarified that the person filling out the application can't be the AR or BAR due to technical issues.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Emails and market notices will be sent to current participants; instructions will be included.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Important to register and verify email if you're a new member.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Applicants must use their own email and correctly fill out the entity's legal name and other required fields.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Option to download the submitted application and instructions on how to pay the fee provided.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Issues like naming conventions and finance acceptance of email notifications noted.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Plan to process applications and notify issues weekly.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><a href="/sharing/?token=b57f30d2-7f94-49ed-9c6c-dce5573f4e18"><span style="font-weight: 400;">14</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - 9/5/24 TAC Workshop for Stakeholder Process - Caitlin Smith</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Discussed the successful expansion from 300,000 to 400,000 bids but identified performance issues with the 10% network model.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">ERCOT is exploring solutions to the performance issues, including minimum bid prices and the impact of price discovery bids.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Highlighted the upcoming September 5 TAC workshop, feedback on WebEx versus in-person, and potential follow-up workshop.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Consensus for an in-person meeting and the need for a clear agenda was emphasized.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><a href="/sharing/?token=71749c06-d87c-43ca-82c5-2256ddbbf2db"><span style="font-weight: 400;">15 </span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">- Combo Ballot - Vote - Caitlin Smith</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Motion to approve combo ballot carries unamiously</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><img src="/storage/docs/2024/08/20240827TACComboItems.png" width="570" height="126" /></span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><img src="/storage/docs/2024/08/20240827TACCombo.png" width="571" height="563" /></span></p>
<p><a href="/sharing/?token=171c1d4f-c6b8-4971-ad3c-1fbe7f3c83d7"><span style="font-weight: 400;">16</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> - Adjourn</span></p>